Table 1.
Nonbiological VOC removal method | Working mechanism | Pollutant | Catalyst | Inlet of VOC | Retention time | Removal efficiency of VOC | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absorption (wet scrubbing) | Scrubber absorbs the VOCs. This is applicable for water-soluble VOCs | Butanol | - | 5 ppmv | 20 ms (residence time) | 90% | Regeneration of scrubbing liquid through an advanced oxidation process. | Pressure drop in packing structure. A secondary pollutant is a problem. |
[23] |
Incineration (Metal catalyst) | Laboratory scale tubular reactor used in the decomposition of pollutants in the presence of metal catalysts | 1,2-Dichloroethane | Pt; Fe2O3 | [C2H4Cl2]0 is the inletconcentration (mol/ L) | 1.0 s | 66–99.8%; 53–99% at 550°C | Control over retention time with operating temperature. | Disposal of waste is the problem. High energy consumption. | [24] |
Ozonation | COF mineralization through hydroxyl radicals from the catalyst | Cooking oil fumes (COF) | Fe(OH)3 | THC concentration of 211 ppm | 0.05 s | 95% | The oxidizing capability of ozone. | Extensive evaluation of catalyst performance for different VOCs. | [25] |
Adsorption and ozonation | Adsorption of VOCs followed by oxidation | Methyl ethyl ketone | Alumina silicate | 1.35 g m3 | - | 93% | Strong thermal and chemical stability. | Adsorbed byproducts decrease the adsorption capacity. | [26] |
Adsorption andcondensation | Open-circuit and closed-loop flow in regeneration mode | VOCs | - | 4099 ppmv | - | 98.50% | Ozone and secondary organic aerosol production after VOCs reduction. | Checking theapplicability for urban areas. | [27] |
Oxidization and volatilization | Anodic electrochemical oxidation of pollutants | Chloroform, benzene, trichloroethylene,and toluene | Pt/Ti, IrO2/TiIrO2/Ti, IrO2/TiIrO2/Ti, and IrO2− Ru−Pd/TiIrO2− Ru−Pd/Ti anodes are employed | 150 mg/L | - | 98% | Electrochemical properties of the anode in the removal of VOCs. | Selection of suitable anodes forparticular VOC. Disposal of catalyst is a problem. |
[28] |
Membrane separation | The capture of VOCs by a dense porous fibrous membrane | Aniline, benzene, and toluene | Poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) | 2 mL of VOC solvent | - | 871 mg/g anilineadsorbed | Higher adsorption capacity. | Membranes are expensive. Aging of polymers. |
[29] |