Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;13(4):9521–9547. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2061148

Table 3.

Microalgal biomass as an alternative or supplement to fishmeal and fish oil

Microalgae species Aquaculture species Fish oil/fish meal/dietary inclusion level replacement Effects of algae biomass Ref.
Schizochytrium Pacific white shrimp
(Litopenaeus vannamei)
  • 4% inclusion in the diet

  • Although shrimp survival, digestive enzyme activity, and fatty acid content were not affected, their specific growth rate was much higher than in the control group.

[118]
Dunaliella salina Giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon)
  • 5–10% incorporation in feed

  • The immune system and antioxidants (superoxide dismutase and catalase) improved significantly and the survival rate was significantly boosted.

[119]
Phaeodactylum
tricornutum
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
  • 6% replacement of fish meal

  • There is no negative impact on growth, protein, lipids, energy, ash, growth performance, etc., in the feed that is used.

[109]
Nannochloropsis sp. and Isochrysis sp. Juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
  • 15% fish meal protein replacement

  • Increased feed intake and fish growth. Survival, feed conversion ratios, and muscle ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acid levels did not differ between the treatment groups.

[120]
Schizochytrium sp. Tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
  • 100% replacement of fish oil

  • However, the survival rate did not alter substantially.

[85]
Nannochloropsis gaditana, T. chuii, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)
  • 0.5 and 1% inclusion in feed

  • Increased defensive activity

[121]
Chlorella vulgaris Giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii)
  • 6–8% fish meal substitute

  • M. rosenbergii postlarvae had a faster growth rate, a better immunological response (total haemocyte count and prophenoloxidase activity), and were resistant to Aeromonas hydrophila infection.

[122]
Arthrospira sp. Golden barb (Puntius gelius)
  • 20% fishmeal substitute

  • Fish growth rates have increased significantly.

[123]
Pavlova viridis European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)
  • Fish oil replacement 50–100%

  • In terms of growth performance and nutrient consumption, there are no detrimental consequences on fish.

[124]
Nannochloropsis sp.
Nanofrustulum sp. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), common carp (Cyprinus carpio)
  • fish meal replacement 5 or 10%

  • Algal meal outperformed fish meal in terms of growth and feed intake, indicating that it may be used in place of fish meal.

[125]
Tetraselmis sp. Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
Arthrospira platensis Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
  • 0.5–2% inclusion in feed

  • Enhanced fish health through tissue protection and antioxidant effects

[126]
Arthrospira sp. Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
  • Replacing fish meal by up to 43%

  • Unlike corn-gluten meal control, there was no deleterious impact on growth or feed consumption.

[242]