Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;50(2):853–866. doi: 10.1042/BST20210479

Table 1. Comparison of the available techniques to investigate immune signaling processes (fps: frame per second).

Technique XY res (nm) Z res (nm) Temporal (fps) Limitation Advantages Typical use
Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy 250 100 100 Only the interface with coverslip High contrast Synapse formation, single-molecule dynamics
Variable angle (VA)-TIRF microscopy 250 10 100 Only the interface with coverslip Z resolution++ Cell topography
Confocal 250 500 20 Photobleaching Simplicity Cell structure, interactions
Airyscan 125 250 5 Photobleaching Resolution Cell structure, interactions
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, ground state depletion (GSD) microscopy 20 50 1 Toxicity, Adequate dyes Instant super-resolution Live cell super-resolution, Combination with single molecule
Instant structural illumination microscopy (SIM) 125 250 100 Photobleaching Speed, resolution Dynamic cell–cell interactions
Lattice Light-sheet microscopy 250 500 100 Setup complexity Gentle and fast imaging Dynamic cell–cell interactions
Lattice SIM 125 250 20 Setup complexity Gentle and high resolution imaging Dynamic cell–cell interactions
Single molecular localization microscopy (SMLM) 15 15 - Chemically fixed cells, Elaborate data analysis Axial and lateral resolution Local and global distribution of molecules
Minimal photon fluxes (MINFLUX) microscopy 2 (20) 2 (20) - (100 µs) Chemically fixed cells, Elaborate data analysis Axial and lateral resolution Cell structure, interactions, Localization of molecules (tracking)