Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;3:798257. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.798257

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for key study variables by gender and sexual orientation.

Heterosexual men
(n = 106)
Heterosexual women
(n = 106)
Gay men
(n = 144)
Lesbian women
(n = 144)
Participant gender
differences
Partner gender
differences
Sexual orientation
differences
Range M SD Range M SD Range M SD Range M SD
Between-couples variable
Relationship length (years) 1.0–35.0 3.89 4.59 1.0–35.0 3.89 4.59 0.50–61.50 6.41 9.94 0.50–19.00 4.69 4.47 _________ ________ 3.20 (2) * a
Within-couples variables
BMI 18.79–49.66 27.46 5.96 17.45–48.59 24.27 5.56 16.89–40.92 26.28 4.59 16.88–61.83 29.38 8.23 −0.41 (0.28) 1.57 (0.28)*** 0.98 (0.33)**
Dissatisfaction with own body 0–3.0 1.02 0.92 0–6.0 1.58 1.37 0–4.0 1.31 1.05 0–6.0 1.71 1.09 0.24 (0.05)*** −0.04 (0.05) 0.10 (0.05)
Dissatisfaction with partner's body 0–4.0 0.93 0.92 0–8.0 1.24 1.45 0–4.0 0.99 1.03 0–5.0 1.25 1.13 0.12 (0.05)* −0.03 (0.05) 0.03 (0.05)
Relationship quality 8.50–16.60 13.04 1.84 5.20–16.60 12.90 2.03 8.80–17.60 13.69 1.57 6.80–17.70 13.86 1.82 −0.02 (0.08) 0.08 (0.08) 0.40 (0.10)***
Weight change: self −1.0 to 3.0 0.30 0.62 −1.0 to 4.0 0.43 0.77 −2.0 to 3.0 0.31 0.79 −2.0 to 3.0 0.36 0.83 0.04 (0.03) −0.02 (0.03) −0.01 (0.04)
Weight change: partner −1.0 to 3.0 0.22 0.59 −2.0 to 2.0 0.19 0.57 −2.0 to 3.0 0.30 0.72 −2.0 to 2.0 0.17 0.69 −0.04 (0.03) −0.03 (0.03) 0.02 (0.03)

For the between-couples variable, sexual orientation differences were examined using sexual orientation as a predictor in a one-way ANOVA; the value presented is an F statistic (degrees of freedom). For the within-couples variable, participant gender, partner gender, and sexual orientation (participant gender * partner gender) differences were examined using actor gender, partner gender, and actor * partner gender as predictors in multilevel models; values presented are unstandardized estimates (standard error). Significant gender or sexual orientation differences are shown in bold.

a

Post-hoc tests did not reveal significant differences.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.