Skip to main content
. 1999 Nov;65(11):4715–4724. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.11.4715-4724.1999

TABLE 3.

Efficacy of DNA extraction procedures evaluated on the basis of DNA yield and cell lysis

Procedure Chemical treatmenta Physical treatmentb DNA yield (μg g [dry wt]−1)c
% Cell lysis with wetland sediment (mean ± SE)d
Agricultural soil Forest soil Wetland sediment
1 SDS B 7.0 ± 0.5 26 ± 4 32 ± 1 68 ± 4
2 SDS-phenol B 7.8 ± 0.2 31 ± 5 40 ± 4 77 ± 5
3 SDS-chloroform B 7.9 ± 1.2 35 ± 7 53 ± 8 81 ± 4
4 SDS-Chelex 100 B 6.2 ± 0.3 19 ± 5 32 ± 2 68 ± 7
5 Lysozyme-SDS FT 1.5 ± 0.7 4 ± 3 6 ± 1 65 ± 4
6 GTC FT <0.1 <0.1 0.2 ± 0.3 64 ± 3
7 SDS FT 2.7 ± 0.8 6 ± 3 6 ± 1 63 ± 6
8 Lysozyme-SDS B 1.5 ± 1.2 9 ± 4 7 ± 4 69 ± 2
9 GTC B <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 67 ± 4
a

See Table 2, footnotes a and b

b

See Table 2, footnote c

c

Calculated from the average density of ethidium bromide-stained DNA bands by using NIH Image software. The values are averages ± standard errors based on three or four independent extractions. 

d

Estimated from the DAPI direct counts of bacterial cells per microscope field before and after DNA extraction. The values are average percentages of cells lysed ± standard errors based on three independent DNA extractions performed by using the same DNA extraction procedure.