Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;13:903378. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.903378

TABLE 3.

Grading system of evidence and recommendation.

Guideline Grading System Used Description of Evidence Description of Recommendation
Qiu, HB 2021 (Association SoCRDoCM, 2021) GRADE High; Moderate; Low; Very low Strong; Weak
Collins, T. 2020 (Collins et al., 2020) GRADE High (1); Moderate (2); Low (3); Very low (4) Strong; Moderate; Weak
Chou, C.C. 2018 (Chou et al., 2018) GRADE High [A]; Moderate [B]; Low [C]; Very low [D] Strong [1]; Weak [2]
Qu, JM 2018 (Infectious disease group RmboCMA, 2018) Self-defined High(I); Moderate (II); Low (III) Strong(A); Moderate(B); Weak(C)
Lenoe, M. 2018 (Leone et al., 2018) GRADE Strong; Moderate; Weak; Very weak GRADE 1+; GRADE 1-; GRADE 2+; GRADE 2-
Torres, A. 2017 (Torres et al., 2017) GRADE High; Moderate; Low; Very low Strong; Weak
Mikasa, K. 2016 (Mikasa et al., 2016) Self-defined I (Randomized comparative study); II (Non-randomized comparative study); III (Case report); IV (Specialist’s opinion) A (strongly recommended); B (general recommendation), C (comprehensive evaluation by the attending physician)
Kalil, A.C. 2016 (Kalil et al., 2016) GRADE High; Moderate; Low; Very low Strong; Weak
Mehta, Y. 2014 (Mehta et al., 2014) GRADE High (A) to very low (C) Strong (grade 1); weak (grade 2)
Klompas, M. 2014 (Klompas et al., 2014) GRADE and Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care High(I); Moderate (II); Low (III) Basic practices; Special approaches; Generally not Recommended; No recommendation
Alvarez-Lerma, F. 2014 (Álvarez Lerma et al., 2014) GRADE High; Moderate; Low; Very low Strong; Weak
Li, YM 2013 (Association CcmboCM, 2013) GRADE High(A); moderate(B); low(C); very low(D) Strong (1); Weak (2)
Gupta, D. 2012 (Gupta et al., 2012) Modified GRADE system Level 1; Level 2; Level 3; Useful practice point GRADE A; GRADE B

GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.