Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;18(6):1609–1615. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9940

Table 1.

Pairwise comparisons of RMMA indices.

Scoring Montages RMMA Indexa P Valuesb
4MT 1M 2M 1T 2T 1C 2C
4MT 1.6|2.8|3.3
1M 1.6|3.9|5.8 .363
2M 1.8|3.2|3.6 1.000 1.000
1T 1.9|3.2|4.9 .174 1.000 .624
2T 1.5|2.5|3.9 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.711
1C 0.6|1.3|2.9 1.000 .023 1.000 .009 1.000
2C 0.5|1.3|2.8 1.000 .009 1.000 .003 1.000 1.000

aNonnormally distributed data are shown in quartiles (25%|median|75%). bFriedman test and Dunn test; P values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni correction; For P values larger than or equal to 1 after the correction, they are displayed as 1.000; significant differences (P < .05) are underlined. EMG = electromyography, PSG = polysomnography, RMMA = rhythmic masticatory muscle activity, 4MT = reference standard, PSG with bilateral masseter and temporalis muscle EMG traces, 1M = PSG with unilateral masseter muscle EMG trace, 2M = PSG with bilateral masseter muscle EMG traces, 1T = PSG with unilateral temporalis muscle EMG trace, 2T = PSG with bilateral temporalis muscle EMG traces, 1C = PSG with unilateral chin EMG trace, 2C = PSG with bilateral chin EMG traces.