Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2021 Nov 16;84(3):860–878. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12813

Table 3.

Models Predicting Two Dimensions of Negative Relationship Quality

Disagreement
Instability
OLS(b) Model 1 OLS(b) Model 2 Odds Ratios Model 1 Odd Ratios Model 2

Relationship Status
 Daters −0.64 −0.58 0.72 0.78
 Cohabitors −0.64 −0.58 0.60 0.66
 Marrieds −1.04**a −0.97** 0.32***a 0.0.50*
 (ref: LATs)
Age 0.02 0.97
Woman (ref: Man) −0.13 1.08
Education
 Some College 0.11 1.18
 Bachelors+ −0.19 1.45
 (ref: H.S. or less)
Race/Ethnicity
 Black, Non-Hispanic −0.42* 0.72
 Hispanic −0.12 0.85
 (ref: White, Non-Hispanic)
Owns home (ref: No) −0.05 0.99
One Child or More <18 in HH (ref: None) 0.42* 1.19
Metro (ref: non-Metro) 0.01 1.18
Household Income
 $25,000--$39,999 0.07 0.78
 $40,000--$$74,999 −0.16 0.57*
 $75,000--$$99,999 −0.40 0.55
 $100,000 or more −0.29 0.55*
(ref: Less than $25,000)
Duration of Relationship (years) −0.00 0.99
Previously Married (ref: Never Married) −0.14 1.23
_cons 7.00*** 6.26*** 0.64 3.22

N 2079 2079 2064 2064
R2 / Pseudo R2 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04
*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001

Note: Superscript "a" indicates significant differences (p < .05) when cohabitation is the reference group.