Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;22:243. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02461-4

Table 2.

Degree of axial shortening according to some studies

Study Axial shortening (mm) Time Number of subjects Country or area Age(y) Inclusion criteria Instrument
Gardner. et al. [8] 0.04 1 M 9 USA 11–15 −1.00 ~ − 4.00D Lenstar
Ana González-Mesa. et al. [9] 0.157 1 M 34 Spain 18–30 −0.50 ~ − 4.50D IOL-Master
António Queirós. et al. [10] ·approximately 0.02 1 W 62 Asian 5–19 − 1.00 ~ − 8.00D IOL-Master
Lau, Jason K. et al. [11] ·approximately 0.25 1 W 25 Hong Kong, China 6–10 − 0.50 ~ − 4.00D Lenstar
Lau, Jason K. et al. [12] ·0.26 ± 0.41 1 W 58 Hong Kong, China 6–10 − 0.50 ~ − 4.00D Lenstar
Michael J Lipson. et al. [13] 0.01 ± 0.53 1Y 97 USA 7–14 − 1.00 ~ − 6.50D A- scan
Helen A. Swarbrick. et al. [15] 0.04 ± 0.08 3 M 26 Australia 10–17 − 1.00 ~ − 5.50D IOL-Master