Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2022 May 27:2022.05.26.22275532. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2022.05.26.22275532

A global systematic analysis of the occurrence, severity, and recovery pattern of long COVID in 2020 and 2021

Sarah Wulf Hanson 1, Cristiana Abbafati 2, Joachim G Aerts 3, Ziyad Al-Aly 4,5, Charlie Ashbaugh 1, Tala Ballouz 6, Oleg Blyuss 7,8, Polina Bobkova 9, Gouke Bonsel 10, Svetlana Borzakova 11,12, Danilo Buonsenso 13,14, Denis Butnaru 15, Austin Carter 1, Helen Chu 16, Cristina De Rose 13, Mohamed Mustafa Diab 17,18, Emil Ekbom 19, Maha El Tantawi 20, Victor Fomin 21, Robert Frithiof 22, Aysylu Gamirova 23, Petr V Glybochko 24, Juanita A Haagsma 25, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard 26, Erin B Hamilton 1, Gabrielle Harris 27, Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal 28,29, Raimund Helbok 30, Merel E Hellemons 3, David Hillus 31, Susanne M Huijts 32, Michael Hultström 22,33, Waasila Jassat 34, Florian Kurth 35,36, Ing-Marie Larsson 22, Miklós Lipcsey 22, Chelsea Liu 37, Callan D Loflin 27, Andrei Malinovschi 38, Wenhui Mao 17,39, Lyudmila Mazankova 40, Denise McCulloch 41, Dominik Menges 6, Noushin Mohammadifard 42, Daniel Munblit 43,44, Nikita A Nekliudov 23, Osondu Ogbuoji 39, Ismail M Osmanov 45,11, José L Peñalvo 46,47, Maria Skaalum Petersen 48,49, Milo A Puhan 50,51, Mujibur Rahman 52, Verena Rass 30, Nickolas Reinig 1, Gerard M Ribbers 28, Antonia Ricchiuto 53, Sten Rubertsson 22,54, Elmira Samitova 45,40, Nizal Sarrafzadegan 42,55, Anastasia Shikhaleva 9, Kyle E Simpson 1, Dario Sinatti 13, Joan B Soriano 56,57, Ekaterina Spiridonova 23, Fridolin Steinbeis 31, Andrey A Svistunov 24, Piero Valentini 13, Brittney J van de Water 58,59, Rita van den Berg-Emons 28, Ewa Wallin 22, Martin Witzenrath 35,60, Yifan Wu 1, Hanzhang Xu 61, Thomas Zoller 31, Christopher Adolph 62,63, James Albright 1, Joanne O Amlag 1, Aleksandr Y Aravkin 64,1,65, Bree L Bang-Jensen 1, Catherine Bisignano 1, Rachel Castellano 1, Emma Castro 1, Suman Chakrabarti 1,66, James K Collins 1, Xiaochen Dai 1,65, Farah Daoud 1, Carolyn Dapper 1, Amanda Deen 1, Bruce B Duncan 67, Megan Erickson 1, Samuel B Ewald 1, Alize J Ferrari 68,1, Abraham D Flaxman 1,65, Nancy Fullman 1, Amiran Gamkrelidze 69, John R Giles 1, Gaorui Guo 1, Simon I Hay 1,65, Jiawei He 1, Monika Helak 1, Erin N Hulland 1,66, Maia Kereselidze 69, Kris J Krohn 1, Alice Lazzar-Atwood 1, Akiaja Lindstrom 68,70, Rafael Lozano 1,65, Beatrice Magistro 71, Deborah Carvalho Malta 72, Johan Månsson 1, Ana M Mantilla Herrera 73,68, Ali H Mokdad 1,65, Lorenzo Monasta 74, Shuhei Nomura 75,76, Maja Pasovic 1, David M Pigott 1,65, Robert C Reiner Jr 1,65, Grace Reinke 1, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro 77,78, Damian Francesco Santomauro 79,68,1, Aleksei Sholokhov 1, Emma Elizabeth Spurlock 1,80, Rebecca Walcott 81, Ally Walker 1, Charles Shey Wiysonge 82,83, Peng Zheng 1,65, Janet Prvu Bettger 84, Christopher JL Murray 1,65, Theo Vos 1,65
PMCID: PMC9164454  PMID: 35664995

Abstract

Importance:

While much of the attention on the COVID-19 pandemic was directed at the daily counts of cases and those with serious disease overwhelming health services, increasingly, reports have appeared of people who experience debilitating symptoms after the initial infection. This is popularly known as long COVID.

Objective:

To estimate by country and territory of the number of patients affected by long COVID in 2020 and 2021, the severity of their symptoms and expected pattern of recovery

Design:

We jointly analyzed ten ongoing cohort studies in ten countries for the occurrence of three major symptom clusters of long COVID among representative COVID cases. The defining symptoms of the three clusters (fatigue, cognitive problems, and shortness of breath) are explicitly mentioned in the WHO clinical case definition. For incidence of long COVID, we adopted the minimum duration after infection of three months from the WHO case definition. We pooled data from the contributing studies, two large medical record databases in the United States, and findings from 44 published studies using a Bayesian meta-regression tool. We separately estimated occurrence and pattern of recovery in patients with milder acute infections and those hospitalized. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of long COVID globally and by country in 2020 and 2021 as well as the severity-weighted prevalence using disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study.

Results:

Analyses are based on detailed information for 1906 community infections and 10526 hospitalized patients from the ten collaborating cohorts, three of which included children. We added published data on 37262 community infections and 9540 hospitalized patients as well as ICD-coded medical record data concerning 1.3 million infections. Globally, in 2020 and 2021, 144.7 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 54.8–312.9) people suffered from any of the three symptom clusters of long COVID. This corresponds to 3.69% (1.38–7.96) of all infections. The fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive clusters occurred in 51.0% (16.9–92.4), 60.4% (18.9–89.1), and 35.4% (9.4–75.1) of long COVID cases, respectively. Those with milder acute COVID-19 cases had a quicker estimated recovery (median duration 3.99 months [IQR 3.84–4.20]) than those admitted for the acute infection (median duration 8.84 months [IQR 8.10–9.78]). At twelve months, 15.1% (10.3–21.1) continued to experience long COVID symptoms.

Conclusions and relevance:

The occurrence of debilitating ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 is common. Knowing how many people are affected, and for how long, is important to plan for rehabilitative services and support to return to social activities, places of learning, and the workplace when symptoms start to wane.

Introduction

Much of the attention of disease surveillance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has concentrated on the number of infections, the large number of cases requiring hospital care for severe infection, and those who have died from the disease. Less attention has been given to the quantification of those who continue to experience symptoms past the acute infection stage. Terms such as long COVID, COVID long haulers, brain fog, post-COVID-19 condition, or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 have been used to describe a diverse array of ongoing symptoms. In October 2021, the World Health Organization released a clinical case definition for post-COVID-19 condition as symptoms that are present at three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection with a minimum duration of 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.16 We will use the term long COVID in this paper.

Post-acute infection fatigue syndromes have been described for other viruses and bacteria.710 An ongoing low-grade inflammation has been postulated to cause these symptoms, but the pathology remains largely unknown and treatments are based on symptom relief.2,11,12 The impact on affected individuals is substantial, and special clinics dealing with patients of long COVID have arisen to respond to an increasing need for supportive and rehabilitative care.1316

A meta-analysis of 45 follow-up studies of COVID patients, of which only three had a follow-up time greater than three months, found 84 long-term effects of COVID-19, with shortness of breath, fatigue, and sleep disorders or insomnia as the most common symptoms.17 Studies have most frequently just reported on individual symptoms or counts of symptoms but less on severity, overlap of symptoms and pattern of recovery.1,1822

In this paper, we have collated the information on long COVID into three common clusters of symptoms largely based on joint analyses with custodians of follow-up studies after COVID-19 diagnosis in ten countries, supplemented by published data and medical record databases. From this pooled information on the occurrence of these three symptom clusters, their severity, and the limited information on duration, we derived estimates of incidence, prevalence, and severity-weighted prevalence for 204 countries and territories for the years 2020 and 2021.

This analysis complies with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER).23 The full GATHER checklist is provided in eTable 1.

Methods

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection

We derived estimates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the IHME COVID model, a statistical Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) compartmental model fit to data on daily reported deaths, hospitalizations, and infections; seroprevalence; and excess mortality data. Greater detail of the relevant aspects of this model and its data and assumptions is available in the Supplement eSection 3.2426

Incidence of symptomatic infection

We took estimates of new, daily infections from this COVID model and assumed that long COVID only occurs in those with symptomatic infection. From a published review, we selected studies that estimated the proportion of asymptomatic infections in representative screened samples with antibody testing (Supplementary Appendix Data Inputs).27 We pooled the logit-transformed proportions of asymptomatic cases from six studies in a random effects meta-analysis (eFigure 5) and multiplied one minus the predicted proportion by infections to estimate the incidence of symptomatic infection.

Incidence and prevalence of long COVID

Case definition

We define the incidence of long COVID as newly onset or persisting symptoms three months after an acute episode of COVID-19 which impact daily functioning and were not preexisting symptoms before SARS-CoV-2 infection. This aligns with the WHO clinical case definition of post-COVID condition, their preferred term for long COVID.5

Input data

From the long list of persisting symptoms reported by a proportion of COVID-19 cases after the acute phase, we selected three major symptom clusters based on frequency and the ability to quantify their relative severity using health state descriptions and corresponding disability weights (DWs) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. GBD uses 236 health states and DWs to quantify the non-fatal consequences of diseases and injuries.28 Table 1 shows the health states, lay descriptions, and disability weights used for long COVID. The three symptom clusters were a) fatigue with bodily pains and/or symptoms of depression or anxiety; b) cognitive problems such as forgetfulness or difficulty in concentrating, commonly referred to as “brain fog”; and c) ongoing respiratory problems with shortness of breath and persistent cough as the main symptoms. We decided to distinguish between two severity levels for cognitive problems and three levels of severity for the ongoing respiratory symptoms. From here on, we refer to the “fatigue”, “respiratory”, and “cognitive” clusters.

Table 1.

Health states, lay descriptions, and disability weights used for the three symptom clusters of long COVID.

Outcome Health State Lay description DW (95% UI)
Mild respiratory symptoms Chronic respiratory problems, mild has cough and shortness of breath after heavy physical activity but is able to walk long distances and climb stairs. 0.019 (0.011 – 0.039)
Moderate respiratory symptoms Chronic respiratory problems, moderate has cough, wheezing and shortness of breath, even after light physical activity. The person feels tired and can walk only short distances or climb only a few stairs. 0.225 (0.153 – 0.310)
Severe respiratory symptoms Chronic respiratory problems, severe has cough, wheezing and shortness of breath all the time. The person has great difficulty walking even short distances or climbing any stairs, feels tired when at rest, and is anxious. 0.408 (0.273 – 0.556)
Mild cognitive symptoms Cognitive problems, mild has some trouble remembering recent events and finds it hard to concentrate and make decisions and plans. 0.069 (0.046 – 0.099)
Severe cognitive symptoms Cognitive problems, moderate has memory problems and confusion, feels disoriented, at times hears voices that are not real, and needs help with some daily activities. 0.377 (0.252 – 0.508)
Fatigue syndrome Infectious disease, post-acute consequences is always tired and easily upset. The person feels pain all over the body and is depressed. 0.219 (0.148 – 0.308)

GBD disability weights (DWs) quantify health loss as a fraction of time lived within a health state. For severe cognitive symptoms of long COVID we use the health state of moderate cognitive problems that is also used in GBD for moderate dementia.

We conducted a systematic review of published papers on the long-term consequences of COVID-19 but found that no published study provided enough detail for our quantification purposes. From 7362 unique search hits and additions screened from a living systematic review29, we included 46 published articles from 44 studies that contain follow-up data of at least one defining symptom included in our defined symptom clusters (Supplementary Appendix Data Inputs). We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines;30 our PRISMA checklist is in the appendix (eSection 5), and the search protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42020210101).31

Instead of relying on published reports only, we contacted study authors of published studies and ongoing COVID-19 follow-up studies that were registered at the ISRCTN registry.32 From 23 positive responses of 42 study authors contacted, ten were able to share symptom cluster data in time for inclusion in our study (Table 2). With researchers from the ten follow-up studies, we developed algorithms to define the three symptom clusters by severity level by choosing symptom questions and measures employed in each study that would most closely match the wording of the lay descriptions that were presented to respondents of the GBD DW surveys (Table 1). In the Supplement eSection 5, we present details of the algorithms for each of the included studies. We utilized the cohort data with explicit questions comparing current symptoms to those pre-COVID to adjust the remainder of the cohort data lacking pre-COVID comparisons (Table 2, Supplementary Appendix Data Inputs).

Table 2.

Follow-up studies of long COVID, their inclusion of community and/or hospitalized cases, sample size, follow-up period, comparison method, and reported symptoms

Follow-up study Community sample size Hospital/ICU sample size Follow-up since end of acute episode (days) Comparison group Outcomes
Cohort studies with individual-level data
CO-FLOW (Netherlands)41 285 adults 81, 171 Self-reported health status one year prior to survey Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster by severity, cognitive cluster
Faroe Islands39 362 all ages 8 all ages 0, 16, 46, 76 None Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster, cognitive cluster
Helbok et al. (Austria)69 17 adults 68 adults 81 Self-reported health status one year prior to survey Fatigue cluster, cognitive cluster
Isfahan COVID Cohort (Iran)70 1938 all ages 120 Self-reported pre-COVID health status Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster, cognitive cluster
pa-COVID (Germany)71,72 29 adults 145 adults 42, 90, 180, 365 None Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster by severity, cognitive cluster
PronMed ICU (Sweden)73,74 158 adults 121, 166, 346 None Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster, cognitive cluster
Rome ISARIC (Italy)49 82 children, 52 adults 42 (adults); 56 (children) Self-reported pre-COVID health status Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster, cognitive cluster
StopCOVID Cohort (Russia)51,75 885 children, 6908 adults 171, 247, 351 Self-reported pre-COVID health status Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster by severity, cognitive cluster
US Longitudinal COVID-19 Cohort HAARVI (USA)76 160 adults 17 adults 164 (comm); 143 (hosp) None Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster, cognitive cluster
Zürich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort (Switzerland)38 Prospective 888 adults; retrospective 316 adults Prospective 40 adults; retrospective 74 adults 7, 23, 83, 173, 263, 353 (comm); 3, 63, 153, 243, 333 (hosp/ICU) Self-reported pre-COVID health status Fatigue cluster, respiratory cluster by severity, cognitive by severity cluster
Administrative data sources
PRA administrative data (USA)33 772,611 all ages 237,274 all ages 87 (comm); 73 (hosp); 101 (ICU) Matched 1:1 to non-COVID controls ICD codes for fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive symptoms
Veterans Affairs administrative data (USA)34,35 73,435 adults 13,654 adults 143 (comm); 123 (hosp); 150 (ICU) Matched to 4,990,835 non-COVID controls ICD codes for fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive symptoms
Published articles
Anastasio et al. (Italy)77 379 adults 135 None Dyspnoea, memory loss
ANOSVID (France)78 233 adults 121 adults 259 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, any symptom from their symptom list
Arnold D et al. (UK)79 110 adults 60 (hosp); 53 (ICU) None Fatigue, cough, shortness of breath
Asadi-Pooya et al. (Iran)80 58 children 246 None Fatigue, dyspnoea
Becker et al. (Switzerland)81 90 adults 90, 365 None Fatigue, concentration difficulties, shortness of breath, any symptom from their symptom list
Bellan et al. (Italy)82 238 adults 96 None Dyspnoea
Berg et al. (Denmark)83 5106 children 53, 83, 173, 263, 353 Matched COVID-free control group (either not tested or tested negative) Fatigue, trouble breathing, trouble concentrating
Carfí A et al. (Italy)84 143 adults 27 None Fatigue, dyspnoea
Carvalho-Schneider C et al. (France)85 116 adults 34 adults 30 None Dyspnoea
Chopra N et al. (India)86 53 all ages 21 None Fatigue, exertional dyspnoea
Chopra V et al. (USA)87 488 adults 51 None Cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheezing
Cirulli et al. (USA)18 225 adults 8 adults 28, 58, 88 None Fatigue, cough, dyspnoea.
CLoCk (England)88 3065 children 83 Matched to COVID test-negative controls Tiredness, shortness of breath, confusion/disorientation/drowsiness, any symptom
COD19 (Italy)89 114 adults 189 adults 366 None Fatigue, respiratory disorders
COMEBAC (France)90 478 adults 104 None Memory loss, mental slowness, concentration problems, fatigue, dyspnoea, cough
Coronavirus Infection Survey (CIS) (UK)19,91 3489 children, 21,622 adults 26, 75 (children); Matched 1:1 to non-COVID controls Fatigue, cough
26, 33, 40, 47, 54, 61, 68, 75, 82, 89, 96, 103, 110 (adults)
COVID Symptom Study (CSS) App (UK)20,40 1734 children, 4182 adults 19, 47, 75 None Fatigue, cough, shortness of breath
Darcis et al. (Belgium)92 101 adults (3-month follow-up), 78 adults (6-month follow-up) 85, 171 None Fatigue, exertional dyspnoea, confusion
Dryden et al. (South Africa)93 1258 adults 19 None Fatigue, confusion, dyspnoea
Elkan et al. (Israel)94 66 adults 261 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, memory/concentration impairment
García-Abellán et al. (Spain)95 104 adults (2-month follow-up), 116 adults (6-month follow-up) 51, 171 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, respiratory symptoms, any symptom from their symptom list
Garrigues et al. (France)96 120 all ages 88 (hosp); 81 (ICU) None Fatigue, cough, dyspnoea, memory loss
Halpin S et al. (UK)97 100 adults 39 (hosp); 38 (ICU) None Fatigue, breathlessness, concentration problems, short-term memory problems
Heesakkers et al. (Netherlands)98 246 young adults and adults 365 None Fatigue, cognitive failure, dyspnea
Horwitz et al. (USA)99 126 adults 171 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, cognitive fuzziness/brain fog/difficulty concentrating
Huang et al. (China)54 1655 adults 171 (hosp); 170 (ICU) None Fatigue or muscle weakness, dyspnoea
Jacobson et al. (USA)100 96 all ages 22 all ages 112 (comm); None Memory problems, fatigue, dyspnoea
92 (hosp/ICU)
Kayaaslan et al. (Turkey)101 591 adults 416 adults 113 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, concentration or memory problems
Klein et al. (Israel)102 103 adults 171 None Fatigue, breathing difficulties
Lerum et al. (Norway)103 69 adults 59 (hosp), 55 (ICU) None Dyspnoea
Mandal S et al. (UK)104 217 all ages 45 None Fatigue, breathlessness, cough
Moreno-Pérez et al. (Spain)105 277 adults 77 None Fatigue, dyspnoea, cough, amnesic complaints
Naik et al. (India)106 523 adults 711 adults 63, 84 None Fatigue, dyspnea
Peghin et al. (Italy)107 502 adults 39 adults 182 (comm); 161 (hosp); 191 (ICU) None Fatigue, dyspnoea
Say et al. (Australia)108 97 children 128 None Fatigue
Sibila et al. (Spain)109 172 all ages 81 None Dyspnoea
Sigfrid et al. (UK)110 327 adults 192 None Fatigue, shortness of breath, any symptom
Søraas et al. (Norway)111 676 adults 119 COVID test-negative group Fatigue, dyspnoea, any symptom
Suárex-Robles et al. (Spain)112 134 all ages 81 None Fatigue, dyspnoea
Taboada et al. (Spain)113 183 adults 171 (hosp); 170 (ICU) None Dyspnoea
Tleyjeh et al. (Saudi Arabia)114 222 adults 122 None Fatigue, shortness of breath, concentration issues, memory impairment, any persistent symptoms
Venturelli et al. (Italy)115 767 adults 72 None Confusion, dyspnoea
Wanga et al. (USA)116 417 adults 48 adults 21 COVID test-negative group Fatigue, dyspnoea, cognitive problems
Xiong et al. (China)117 538 adults 81 COVID-free control group (n=184) with similar demographic attributes Fatigue, dyspnoea

In addition, we received analyses from collaborators at the Veterans Affairs Health Administration and from PRA Health Sciences, a data collection of private health insurance plans, based on ICD codes for the primary symptoms belonging to the three symptom clusters of interest among COVID patients compared to matched non-COVID patients (Supplementary Appendix Data Inputs).3335 ICD codes are provided in the Supplement eTable 4.

Modelled symptom cluster recovery patterns and proportions

We first undertook a meta-regression of studies with multiple follow-up measurements to determine the recovery pattern of symptoms. Given the relative scarcity of data, we assumed a similar pattern of recovery for all three symptom clusters. We used separate models for community cases and hospitalized cases using a Bayesian meta-regression tool, MR-BRT (meta-regression—Bayesian, regularized, trimmed), to pool the logit-transformed proportions of cases with any of the three symptom clusters by follow-up time since the end of the acute episode (eFigure 10).36,37 For community cases, we used data from the Zürich and Faroe studies supplemented with data derived from three published studies.1820,3840 With a dummy in the meta-regression, we adjusted the Cirulli, United Kingdom COVID Symptom Study (CSS), and United Kingdom COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) studies as proportions were reported for aggregates of many individual symptoms, rather than only the symptom clusters of our interest.1820,40 For hospitalized cases, we used data from the COVID-19 Follow-up care paths and Long-term Outcomes Within the Dutch health care system (CO-FLOW), Sechenov StopCOVID, PronMed ICU, and the Zürich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort studies supplemented with data derived from two published studies in Switzerland and Spain, both adjusted as in the community cases duration model.38,41 The longest follow-up from these studies was 12 months in the Zürich, Co-FLOW and Sechenov studies. In both models, an exponential decline was assumed in the proportion of cases affected by long COVID. The coefficients on the rate of decline in these initial models were then entered as priors into the models that used all available follow-up data, described below.

Next, we used all the data in models of long COVID in community and hospitalized cases separately. We ran separate models for each of the three clusters and the overlap between clusters and adjusted their outputs proportionally to sum to the values of the models for any of the three clusters of long COVID (eFigures 1115). We had too few data points to run separate models for ICU-admitted cases; in the hospital models for each symptom cluster, we used a dummy variable for those admitted to ICU in order to predict their proportions, with the coefficient informed by the observed relationship between ICU and non-ICU hospitalized data.33,35 We also included variables for sex, whether the data were from an administrative source, and indicator variables for individual symptoms reported in the published articles (cognitive dysfunction, shortness of breath, fatigue).

To estimate the severity distributions, we pooled data from cohorts that had enough detail to determine the two levels of severity of cognitive symptoms and the three levels of severity of ongoing respiratory problems using a random effects meta-analysis with a fixed effect on hospitalized data (eFigures 1617).

Incidence, prevalence, and severity-weighted prevalence of long COVID

To estimate the incidence of long COVID, we first subtracted deceased patients from the incidence numbers of symptomatic COVID infection and then multiplied these surviving patients by the estimated proportions of cases with each symptom cluster at 3 months.42,43(p19),4446 Daily incident cases of long COVID at three months post-infection were multiplied by the average duration, estimated separately for community cases and hospitalized cases. We then summed the prevalent days of long COVID for each of the symptom clusters and their overlap by level of severity where applicable across the years 2020 and 2021. Each of these was multiplied by the corresponding DW to get severity-weighted prevalence, equivalent to the GBD metric of years lived with disability (YLDs). For overlapping clusters, we assumed a multiplicative function to constrain the combined DW to a value between zero and one.47

We present uncertainty intervals (UIs) for all estimates based on the 25th and 975th values of the ordered 1000 draws of the posterior distributions.

Results

Globally within 2020 and 2021, of 3.92 billion (95% UI 3.77–4.05) infections with SARS-CoV-2 through the end of 2021, 3.7% (1.4–8.0) or 144.7 million (54.7–312.6) persons developed long COVID defined as experiencing one or more of the three symptom clusters three months after infection (Table 3). Of these, 130 million (42.1–301) had experienced mild to moderate acute infections in the community, 11.5 million (4.91–20.5) developed long COVID after severe disease needing hospitalization, and 3.03 million (0.892–7.48) after critical acute disease needing ICU care. We estimated that 6.17% (2.43–13.31) of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections who survived the acute episode developed long COVID. This proportion was greater in those who were admitted to intensive care units (ICU) (43.1% [22.6–65.2]) and general hospital wards (27.5% [12.1–47.8]) than in those with less severe symptomatic infections in the community (5.68% [1.85–13.1]). Note that our estimate of the number of global infections is much higher than reported as diagnosed cases because excess deaths, infection-to-death ratios and seroprevalence surveys suggest many more cases must have occurred. We estimated a median duration of long COVID of 3.99 months (IQR 3.84–4.20) in community infections, while hospitalized cases were estimated to experience a longer median duration of 8.84 months (IQR 8.10–9.78) (eFigure 10). The global prevalence of long COVID in 2020–2021 was 5.11 million (2.31–8.72) cases among more severe, hospitalized patients and 31.4 million (10.2–73.5) cases among those who had milder infections.

Table 3.

Incident and prevalent cases of long COVID by sex and severity of initial infection in 2020–2021, in millions.

Males Females Both males and females
Incident cases
 Post-acute fatigue syndrome 26.8 (4.51–84.4) 52.1 (9.60–157) 78.9 (14.4–242)
 Respiratory symptoms 33.5 (8.04–84.0) 55.8 (12.7–139) 89.3 (21.1–222)
 Cognitive symptoms 18.6 (2.49–61.6) 36.6 (4.93–121) 55.2 (7.40–180)
 Any long COVID 52.2 (19.7–115) 92.4 (34.9–199) 145 (55.0–312)
  among community cases 45.8 (14.0–109) 84.3 (27.8–190) 130 (42.1–301)
  among cases needing hospitalization 4.99 (1.97–9.35) 6.47 (2.92–10.8) 11.5 (4.91–20.5)
  among cases needing ICU care 1.39 (0.381–3.54) 1.64 (0.517–3.96) 3.03 (0.892–7.48)
Prevalent cases
 Post-acute fatigue syndrome 6.95 (1.49–20.5) 13.1 (2.91–37.4) 20.0 (4.35–57.7)
 Respiratory symptoms 8.55 (2.34–21.0) 13.8 (3.51–34.1) 22.4 (6.08–54.9)
 Cognitive symptoms 4.77 (0.798–14.9) 9.05 (1.50–28.9) 13.8 (2.32–43.3)
 Any long COVID 13.4 (5.66–28.5) 23.1 (9.55–48.5) 36.5 (15.4–76.6)

The fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive clusters occurred in 51.0% (16.9–92.4), 60.4% (18.9–89.1), and 35.4% (9.4–75.1) cases of long COVID, respectively. In 38.4% (7.94–96.0) of long COVID cases, two or all three of the clusters overlapped (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Proportions of incident long COVID symptom clusters and their overlap in 2020 and 2021 globally

Globally, among prevalent long COVID cases, 63.2% (59.7–66.3) were female. The risk of long COVID at 3 months follow-up under the age of 20 was lower than in adults in milder community infections, 2.73% (0.808–6.65) in children versus 4.76% (1.53–11.3) in adult males and 9.88% (3.38–21.2) in adult females (eTable 15a). The peak ages of long COVID cases were between 20 and 29 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Global incident cases, prevalent cases, and severity-weighted prevalence of long COVID by age, sex, symptom cluster, and overlap of symptom clusters in 2020 and 2021

The average level of disability among long COVID cases, estimated as the ratio of overall long COVID severity-weighted prevalence to prevalence, was 0.231 (0.134–0.370)—equivalent to the GBD DWs for severe neck pain, Crohn’s disease, or long-term consequences of moderately severe traumatic brain injury.28

The age and geographical pattern of incidence and prevalence of long COVID closely follows that of SARS-CoV-2 infections, as we assumed the same risk among survivors of acute infection, severity distributions, and duration in all locations. The counts of incident and prevalent cases of long COVID by country are provided in Table 4.

Table 4.

Incident and prevalent cases of long COVID by country, 2020 and 2021.

Location Incident cases of Long COVID during 2020 (in thousands) Incident cases of Long COVID during 2021 (in thousands) Prevalent cases of Long COVID during 2020 (in thousands) Prevalent cases of Long COVID during 2021 (in thousands)
Global 40500 (15500–88200) 104000 (39400–225000) 6410 (2510–14000) 30100 (12800–63000)
 Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia 2400 (973–5120) 10400 (4270–22000) 383 (160–807) 2890 (1320–5860)
 Central Asia 727 (271–1660) 1790 (678–4060) 106 (41.1–239) 457 (192–1000)
  Armenia 31.2 (11.2–72.1) 82.9 (29.7–182) 5.51 (2.01–12.6) 25.3 (10.3–52.5)
  Azerbaijan 42.2 (14.3–100) 310 (95.3–738) 7.33 (2.54–17.1) 79.0 (26.5–181)
  Georgia 2.96 (0.737–6.86) 124 (33.1–293) 0.247 (0.0534–0.688) 30.1 (8.27–66.9)
  Kazakhstan 107 (27.1–278) 363 (97.7–930) 18.2 (4.66–46.6) 77.3 (22.2–190)
  Kyrgyzstan 87.2 (30.5–192) 130 (43.9–307) 15.3 (5.33–33.9) 39.6 (15.7–90.7)
  Mongolia 0.276 (0.0401–0.917) 61.2 (21.8–141) 0.0621 (0.00862–0.209) 7.89 (2.84–18.8)
  Tajikistan 54.7 (18.2–120) 195 (66.7–431) 8.69 (2.97–18.9) 47.1 (17.9–102)
  Turkmenistan 30.7 (10.7–68.9) 108 (37.5–243) 4.90 (1.74–10.9) 26.6 (10.5–58.2)
  Uzbekistan 371 (99.2–888) 415 (111–1040) 46.2 (12.5–111) 124 (33.8–286)
 Central Europe 281 (118–584) 2700 (1130–5710) 39.1 (16.8–81.2) 819 (376–1650)
  Albania 22.2 (7.82–48.4) 94.1 (35.2–204) 2.96 (1.03–6.33) 28.9 (12.1–59.3)
  Bosnia and Herzegovina 17.6 (6.64–38.9) 103 (41.1–227) 2.32 (0.882–5.16) 30.9 (13.7–66.1)
  Bulgaria 15.9 (6.03–34.1) 219 (72.2–500) 2.35 (0.894–5.00) 62.0 (23.4–130)
  Croatia 6.53 (2.63–14.7) 90.7 (37.9–197) 0.892 (0.378–1.99) 27.4 (12.3–54.5)
  Czechia 25.0 (9.75–54.0) 317 (129–684) 2.28 (0.929–4.93) 103 (46.3–210)
  Hungary 13.4 (5.23–28.9) 211 (81.9–456) 1.57 (0.596–3.37) 66.7 (28.6–140)
  Montenegro 3.04 (1.20–6.46) 24.5 (9.81–51.8) 0.294 (0.119–0.622) 6.70 (2.93–13.7)
  North Macedonia 14.0 (5.48–31.3) 76.3 (29.2–167) 2.19 (0.854–4.93) 21.9 (9.35–46.8)
  Poland 60.2 (25.4–129) 794 (322–1750) 8.60 (3.68–18.4) 250 (114–518)
  Romania 79.5 (32.0–177) 415 (158–931) 11.2 (4.60–24.7) 121 (50.9–248)
  Serbia 18.8 (6.81–42.8) 222 (83.5–478) 3.83 (1.42–8.70) 58.1 (24.0–120)
  Slovakia 3.19 (1.05–8.08) 103 (37.2–228) 0.325 (0.102–0.856) 32.2 (12.9–68.4)
  Slovenia 1.40 (0.425–3.81) 34.1 (11.6–79.4) 0.211 (0.0620–0.582) 10.1 (3.71–23.4)
 Eastern Europe 1390 (577–2930) 5870 (2410–12300) 238 (101–503) 1620 (753–3290)
  Belarus 58.5 (14.8–155) 194 (51.1–498) 11.5 (3.09–28.2) 52.9 (14.3–128)
  Estonia 0.661 (0.236–1.68) 14.7 (5.74–34.5) 0.144 (0.0526–0.369) 4.08 (1.75–9.58)
  Latvia 1.03 (0.295–2.53) 35.4 (11.0–88.0) 0.209 (0.0567–0.513) 10.1 (3.27–24.9)
  Lithuania 1.87 (0.584–4.36) 74.4 (23.9–182) 0.326 (0.100–0.773) 20.8 (7.14–48.8)
  Republic of Moldova 34.8 (10.5–79.1) 92.7 (29.4–215) 5.22 (1.59–12.1) 30.8 (11.3–67.6)
  Russian Federation 1130 (461–2380) 4450 (1790–9230) 200 (86.0–426) 1200 (555–2400)
  Ukraine 161 (50.0–390) 1010 (336–2300) 19.9 (5.92–50.0) 299 (105–688)
 High-income 2180 (899–4500) 7720 (3170–15900) 429 (187–877) 2270 (1050–4540)
 Australasia 3.62 (1.36–7.80) 6.40 (2.72–13.1) 0.591 (0.242–1.24) 0.940 (0.441–1.86)
  Australia 3.49 (1.31–7.54) 6.28 (2.67–12.9) 0.560 (0.231–1.17) 0.917 (0.429–1.81)
  New Zealand 0.125 (0.0498–0.272) 0.126 (0.0524–0.256) 0.0307 (0.0133–0.0665) 0.0229 (0.0111–0.0449)
 High-income Asia Pacific 40.3 (17.0–82.6) 319 (137–651) 7.34 (3.31–14.8) 79.1 (37.7–153)
  Brunei Darussalam 0.0743 (0.0237–0.176) 0.894 (0.318–2.12) 0.0205 (0.00637–0.0492) 0.0618 (0.0234–0.144)
  Japan 29.7 (12.9–60.1) 284 (122–576) 5.06 (2.32–10.1) 71.1 (33.6–138)
  Republic of Korea 4.57 (1.58–10.9) 31.0 (12.3–67.9) 0.905 (0.326–2.16) 7.03 (2.90–15.1)
  Singapore 5.92 (2.20–13.7) 3.47 (1.46–7.25) 1.36 (0.514–3.15) 0.867 (0.398–1.69)
 High-income North America 1050 (436–2210) 3780 (1550–7830) 190 (81.4–397) 1100 (506–2210)
  Canada 27.9 (10.7–58.3) 167 (66.8–345) 6.01 (2.31–12.5) 47.4 (20.4–95.5)
  Greenland 0.00685 (0.00211–0.0157) 0.0622 (0.0225–0.139) 0.00171 (0.000516–0.00406) 0.00726 (0.00281–0.0156)
  United States of America 1020 (425–2160) 3620 (1480–7490) 184 (78.5–384) 1050 (485–2130)
 Southern Latin America 183 (70.6–393) 533 (202–1180) 22.9 (9.13–48.5) 160 (65.7–334)
  Argentina 130 (48.9–286) 388 (140–861) 13.9 (5.44–29.8) 116 (45.5–253)
  Chile 52.1 (19.5–114) 112 (42.2–243) 8.89 (3.46–18.9) 35.4 (14.8–73.4)
  Uruguay 0.450 (0.142–1.06) 33.1 (13.3–71.3) 0.0931 (0.0290–0.225) 8.64 (3.67–17.8)
 Western Europe 898 (371–1840) 3080 (1280–6310) 208 (91.0–423) 928 (436–1820)
  Andorra 0.564 (0.206–1.22) 1.21 (0.457–2.86) 0.116 (0.0425–0.250) 0.415 (0.172–0.872)
  Austria 7.59 (3.03–16.6) 67.0 (24.9–143) 1.43 (0.607–3.02) 20.6 (8.85–42.5)
  Belgium 40.7 (16.4–88.8) 108 (43.3–228) 9.64 (3.97–20.7) 34.0 (15.3–70.4)
  Cyprus 0.292 (0.107–0.683) 7.64 (3.11–16.0) 0.0644 (0.0240–0.152) 1.88 (0.822–3.87)
  Denmark 6.14 (2.26–13.0) 23.8 (9.61–48.8) 1.44 (0.537–3.05) 7.25 (3.23–14.3)
  Finland 3.73 (1.50–7.90) 13.6 (5.53–28.7) 0.935 (0.382–1.95) 3.65 (1.65–7.33)
  France 175 (65.0–378) 513 (203–1090) 40.5 (15.3–89.7) 159 (69.6–326)
  Germany 55.8 (23.2–114) 424 (173–874) 13.2 (5.67–27.2) 129 (59.3–254)
  Greece 3.11 (1.12–7.10) 56.7 (22.7–120) 0.486 (0.168–1.14) 14.4 (6.40–28.8)
  Iceland 0.292 (0.115–0.621) 0.627 (0.256–1.31) 0.0605 (0.0240–0.130) 0.153 (0.0710–0.301)
  Ireland 9.48 (3.30–21.3) 30.0 (11.3–65.8) 2.29 (0.819–5.09) 8.23 (3.31–17.7)
  Israel 25.7 (10.4–53.8) 67.2 (26.8–146) 2.84 (1.20–6.00) 19.3 (8.79–40.5)
  Italy 107 (44.8–219) 433 (180–907) 28.0 (12.3–57.2) 138 (65.1–269)
  Luxembourg 1.18 (0.455–2.54) 5.21 (2.07–11.0) 0.253 (0.0976–0.537) 1.62 (0.707–3.28)
  Malta 0.349 (0.149–0.743) 2.72 (1.15–5.62) 0.0450 (0.0192–0.0942) 0.823 (0.386–1.61)
  Monaco 0.0293 (0.0126–0.0620) 0.268 (0.118–0.541) 0.00534 (0.00225–0.0115) 0.0779 (0.0368–0.152)
  Netherlands 42.0 (16.1–92.1) 145 (57.4–302) 9.87 (3.73–21.7) 43.8 (19.5–89.3)
  Norway 4.15 (1.57–9.26) 16.3 (6.67–34.5) 1.04 (0.409–2.31) 4.34 (1.94–8.61)
  Portugal 13.8 (5.23–30.7) 94.1 (38.0–198) 2.85 (1.10–6.31) 29.3 (13.2–59.7)
  San Marino 0.183 (0.0728–0.390) 0.460 (0.188–0.976) 0.0511 (0.0222–0.106) 0.156 (0.0707–0.313)
  Spain 168 (73.2–348) 373 (153–797) 35.7 (15.6–73.5) 118 (55.2–228)
  Sweden 30.4 (12.0–64.5) 73.7 (31.1–154) 7.50 (3.13–15.6) 25.2 (11.7–49.1)
  Switzerland 9.81 (3.93–21.4) 63.0 (25.4–133) 2.25 (0.941–4.76) 18.3 (8.32–36.2)
  United Kingdom 191 (78.6–398) 560 (233–1160) 47.1 (20.0–96.7) 150 (69.9–297)
 Latin America and Caribbean 5200 (1990–11200) 10100 (3870–22000) 861 (345–1860) 3160 (1360–6650)
 Andean Latin America 906 (340–1960) 1090 (409–2480) 152 (59.5–331) 399 (164–857)
  Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 223 (79.1–485) 257 (85.5–590) 34.0 (12.5–74.6) 94.2 (36.4–206)
  Ecuador 218 (77.8–469) 332 (116–742) 39.6 (14.8–84.6) 111 (43.2–233)
  Peru 466 (166–1050) 498 (177–1130) 78.7 (29.7–177) 194 (76.5–424)
 Caribbean 147 (48.3–342) 325 (121–747) 24.9 (8.29–57.6) 81.9 (33.2–180)
  Antigua and Barbuda 0.0491 (0.0155–0.131) 0.622 (0.209–1.40) 0.0112 (0.00362–0.0291) 0.0969 (0.0352–0.222)
  Bahamas 1.22 (0.387–2.85) 3.46 (1.11–8.02) 0.116 (0.0379–0.269) 0.766 (0.260–1.70)
  Barbados 0.0779 (0.0290–0.172) 0.964 (0.390–2.11) 0.0199 (0.00756–0.0433) 0.151 (0.0650–0.316)
  Belize 0.683 (0.190–1.72) 4.49 (1.11–10.9) 0.0553 (0.0159–0.136) 1.13 (0.305–2.68)
  Bermuda 0.0384 (0.0144–0.0842) 0.409 (0.168–0.847) 0.0101 (0.00386–0.0217) 0.0675 (0.0302–0.133)
  Cuba 1.67 (0.581–3.97) 88.0 (33.4–197) 0.345 (0.126–0.815) 12.2 (4.84–27.3)
  Dominica 0.0121 (0.00227–0.0349) 0.419 (0.138–1.02) 0.00302 (0.000517–0.00876) 0.0366 (0.0131–0.0817)
  Dominican Republic 68.2 (18.5–170) 75.3 (20.6–185) 11.5 (3.20–28.2) 28.4 (8.50–67.5)
  Grenada 0.00863 (0.00183–0.0248) 0.999 (0.297–2.53) 0.00231 (0.000499–0.00671) 0.0630 (0.0201–0.156)
  Guyana 2.40 (0.632–5.95) 10.3 (2.59–26.6) 0.235 (0.0665–0.569) 2.31 (0.617–5.60)
  Haiti 56.9 (10.8–151) 69.8 (10.8–190) 10.5 (2.05–28.1) 20.2 (3.74–52.2)
  Jamaica 2.83 (0.938–6.71) 19.4 (5.86–45.9) 0.236 (0.0778–0.591) 4.23 (1.39–9.97)
  Puerto Rico 4.42 (1.68–10.2) 16.4 (6.47–35.8) 0.569 (0.218–1.23) 4.91 (2.18–10.3)
  Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0138 (0.00201–0.0482) 0.242 (0.0831–0.601) 0.00384 (0.000527–0.0136) 0.0274 (0.00983–0.0640)
  Saint Lucia 0.0179 (0.00450–0.0450) 1.79 (0.581–4.00) 0.00447 (0.00104–0.0111) 0.319 (0.113–0.696)
  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0296 (0.00765–0.0753) 0.606 (0.218–1.47) 0.00692 (0.00181–0.0168) 0.0952 (0.0372–0.215)
  Suriname 1.87 (0.537–4.37) 10.1 (2.88–23.9) 0.262 (0.0774–0.624) 1.88 (0.545–4.34)
  Trinidad and Tobago 1.43 (0.452–3.53) 9.68 (2.81–22.5) 0.153 (0.0493–0.381) 2.02 (0.637–4.44)
  United States Virgin Islands 0.314 (0.106–0.781) 0.796 (0.274–1.99) 0.0459 (0.0145–0.112) 0.190 (0.0767–0.437)
 Central Latin America 2110 (798–4480) 4460 (1690–9520) 337 (134–713) 1320 (562–2780)
  Colombia 252 (94.0–563) 714 (258–1590) 33.2 (12.8–72.7) 219 (88.7–474)
  Costa Rica 18.3 (6.13–41.5) 76.1 (25.4–170) 1.78 (0.596–4.14) 19.1 (7.15–41.8)
  El Salvador 24.1 (8.46–53.2) 64.6 (21.3–146) 3.62 (1.35–8.01) 17.1 (6.23–38.0)
  Guatemala 149 (51.8–348) 316 (99.6–754) 23.5 (8.42–54.2) 81.3 (29.1–188)
  Honduras 99.7 (35.9–231) 254 (92.0–588) 14.5 (5.32–34.5) 67.4 (26.3–152)
  Mexico 1290 (496–2750) 2430 (927–5240) 219 (86.6–465) 746 (324–1540)
  Nicaragua 44.3 (16.8–98.7) 104 (39.8–230) 6.67 (2.58–14.8) 29.1 (12.1–63.6)
  Panama 28.3 (10.3–61.9) 41.9 (15.5–91.5) 4.71 (1.74–10.5) 15.2 (6.24–32.4)
  Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 199 (75.6–434) 463 (172–1010) 30.1 (11.8–64.8) 131 (54.4–274)
 Tropical Latin America 2040 (779–4430) 4270 (1620–9450) 348 (140–751) 1350 (588–2830)
  Brazil 2020 (769–4390) 4110 (1550–9050) 346 (140–747) 1310 (563–2740)
  Paraguay 22.7 (8.39–50.1) 165 (57.3–378) 1.79 (0.660–3.99) 45.7 (17.9–103)
 North Africa and Middle East 4830 (1800–10900) 9410 (3630–21000) 868 (327–1940) 2740 (1140–5970)
  Afghanistan 428 (118–996) 881 (276–2180) 87.3 (24.2–205) 239 (82.4–555)
  Algeria 118 (37.8–297) 194 (56.9–485) 20.5 (6.84–51.2) 56.5 (19.8–135)
  Bahrain 9.17 (3.28–20.4) 24.3 (8.27–55.0) 1.35 (0.490–2.97) 7.46 (2.72–16.7)
  Egypt 1240 (182–3160) 1330 (193–3380) 243 (35.6–624) 475 (73.3–1150)
  Iran (Islamic Republic of) 552 (214–1200) 1750 (673–3730) 97.9 (39.3–209) 447 (187–937)
  Iraq 657 (194–1460) 946 (324–2120) 86.5 (25.0–191) 292 (112–641)
  Jordan 8.45 (2.88–19.2) 282 (95.5–636) 0.356 (0.116–0.844) 76.1 (27.8–169)
  Kuwait 27.4 (7.12–67.9) 57.4 (16.9–129) 4.42 (1.19–11.0) 17.8 (5.61–40.8)
  Lebanon 20.8 (7.05–57.6) 137 (48.7–320) 2.92 (0.728–13.1) 41.4 (16.5–93.2)
  Libya 45.5 (17.3–100) 211 (76.0–472) 4.12 (1.54–9.23) 54.2 (21.1–117)
  Morocco 224 (74.3–506) 933 (273–2240) 26.5 (8.76–64.6) 228 (74.0–515)
  Oman 25.8 (8.84–62.9) 49.6 (15.8–119) 3.75 (1.28–9.35) 14.8 (5.20–33.8)
  Palestine 21.7 (7.38–50.7) 142 (47.9–325) 2.14 (0.711–4.97) 38.3 (13.9–87.2)
  Qatar 37.5 (12.6–86.6) 33.0 (10.7–77.9) 7.46 (2.61–17.1) 12.7 (4.65–28.9)
  Saudi Arabia 226 (70.3–542) 104 (29.9–274) 41.5 (13.7–99.6) 49.5 (16.9–126)
  Sudan 415 (78.1–1080) 306 (75.6–767) 86.1 (17.5–221) 126 (36.6–306)
  Syrian Arab Republic 12.9 (3.64–33.9) 79.9 (19.8–231) 1.31 (0.381–3.32) 20.4 (5.14–56.2)
  Tunisia 22.7 (6.88–54.2) 437 (144–1030) 1.40 (0.378–3.62) 108 (37.9–247)
  Turkey 475 (105–1360) 1240 (426–2820) 99.8 (20.3–298) 348 (121–784)
  United Arab Emirates 22.9 (7.15–53.0) 74.3 (22.8–173) 4.37 (1.37–10.2) 22.4 (7.43–50.8)
  Yemen 231 (28.1–574) 179 (31.4–584) 44.1 (5.14–110) 62.2 (14.2–169)
 South Asia 15700 (5810–34000) 36700 (13500–79300) 2130 (811–4630) 11200 (4670–23800)
  Bangladesh 1550 (508–3700) 3850 (1390–8660) 248 (83.7–603) 1010 (388–2220)
  Bhutan 0.145 (0.0299–0.401) 0.664 (0.245–1.54) 0.0253 (0.00505–0.0720) 0.173 (0.0667–0.384)
  India 11900 (4500–25800) 27900 (10400–59600) 1430 (556–3160) 8830 (3720–18600)
  Nepal 138 (51.9–307) 840 (305–1900) 11.6 (4.42–26.1) 211 (84.2–468)
  Pakistan 2100 (726–4800) 4150 (1410–9360) 437 (155–984) 1180 (432–2630)
 Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Oceania 1340 (519–2890) 8860 (3360–19100) 188 (76.4–403) 1900 (806–3980)
 East Asia 106 (42.3–225) 9.78 (3.86–21.3) 33.0 (13.9–69.4) 8.56 (4.10–16.2)
  China 104 (41.8–223) 3.69 (1.49–7.85) 32.6 (13.7–68.8) 7.01 (3.38–13.5)
  Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 1.06 (0.308–2.70) 2.06 (0.767–4.74) 0.318 (0.0954–0.796) 0.546 (0.214–1.25)
  Taiwan (Province of China) 0.506 (0.0824–1.83) 4.04 (1.46–9.48) 0.133 (0.0222–0.469) 1.00 (0.364–2.40)
 Oceania 4.27 (1.31–11.2) 105 (32.9–262) 0.503 (0.157–1.33) 22.9 (7.69–57.2)
  American Samoa 0.00352 (0.000102–0.0150) 0.00645 (0.000398–0.0241) 0 (0–0) 0.00197 (0.000102–0.00800)
  Cook Islands 0.0211 (0.00760–0.0471) 0.0707 (0.0249–0.165) 0.00236 (0.000851–0.00530) 0.0178 (0.00704–0.0387)
  Fiji 0.0831 (0.0221–0.242) 11.0 (3.40–26.1) 0.0185 (0.00436–0.0565) 1.59 (0.509–3.73)
  Guam 0.803 (0.293–1.89) 2.02 (0.699–4.66) 0.0865 (0.0292–0.211) 0.491 (0.193–1.08)
  Kiribati 0 (0–0) 0.0215 (0.00160–0.0659) 0 (0–0) 0.00474 (0.000353–0.0146)
  Marshall Islands 0 (0–0) 0.0183 (0.00264–0.0537) 0 (0–0) 0.00546 (0.000798–0.0155)
  Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
  Nauru 0.0103 (0.00355–0.0240) 0.0346 (0.0116–0.0795) 0.00113 (0.000389–0.00272) 0.00820 (0.00310–0.0187)
  Niue 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
  Northern Mariana Islands 0.0440 (0.0159–0.0989) 0.0324 (0.0116–0.0747) 0.0102 (0.00388–0.0219) 0.0110 (0.00447–0.0248)
  Palau 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
  Papua New Guinea 3.09 (0.782–8.91) 86.3 (25.3–219) 0.359 (0.0921–1.01) 19.6 (6.28–49.5)
  Samoa 0 (0–0) 0.0136 (0.00186–0.0423) 0 (0–0) 0.00427 (0.000602–0.0132)
  Solomon Islands 0 (0–0) 0.0857 (0.00858–0.330) 0 (0–0) 0.0232 (0.00256–0.0869)
  Tokelau 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
  Tonga 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
  Tuvalu 0.0121 (0.00424–0.0277) 0.0403 (0.0138–0.0911) 0.00134 (0.000470–0.00303) 0.00979 (0.00378–0.0216)
  Vanuatu 0 (0–0) 0.0947 (0.0189–0.299) 0 (0–0) 0.0257 (0.00528–0.0809)
 Southeast Asia 1230 (472–2670) 8750 (3310–18800) 155 (62.0–335) 1870 (790–3920)
  Cambodia 0.261 (0.0389–0.899) 127 (39.8–318) 0.0582 (0.00843–0.206) 19.8 (6.58–48.6)
  Indonesia 770 (300–1680) 5370 (2010–11700) 95.7 (38.0–208) 1250 (527–2630)
  Lao People’s Democratic Republic 0.121 (0.00958–0.439) 12.8 (3.18–38.1) 0.0321 (0.00246–0.117) 1.32 (0.278–4.08)
  Malaysia 4.71 (1.37–12.1) 343 (124–783) 0.887 (0.259–2.40) 52.5 (19.6–117)
  Maldives 1.29 (0.372–3.55) 5.20 (1.82–12.1) 0.189 (0.0568–0.522) 1.38 (0.512–3.22)
  Mauritius 0.227 (0.0591–0.614) 2.14 (0.819–4.87) 0.0633 (0.0170–0.169) 0.238 (0.0890–0.547)
  Myanmar 53.9 (17.8–127) 585 (177–1360) 1.96 (0.634–4.77) 112 (38.1–252)
  Philippines 389 (144–833) 1610 (605–3470) 54.2 (21.2–115) 343 (141–726)
  Seychelles 0.0280 (0.00837–0.0684) 1.95 (0.742–4.29) 0.00562 (0.00164–0.0137) 0.433 (0.174–0.933)
  Sri Lanka 2.03 (0.302–6.59) 123 (45.8–267) 0.415 (0.0604–1.39) 20.6 (7.59–46.3)
  Thailand 2.70 (0.360–9.02) 284 (94.7–693) 0.723 (0.0937–2.43) 36.0 (12.3–89.2)
  Timor-Leste 0.0407 (0.00537–0.130) 13.9 (4.17–36.2) 0.00987 (0.00126–0.0319) 2.10 (0.654–5.30)
  Viet Nam 1.37 (0.426–3.59) 249 (81.6–578) 0.262 (0.0686–0.755) 26.3 (9.08–60.3)
  Sub-Saharan Africa 8840 (3240–19200) 21000 (7610–46400) 1560 (584–3360) 5880 (2390–12700)
 Central Sub-Saharan Africa 1350 (465–2980) 2690 (958–6060) 249 (87.7–556) 780 (296–1710)
  Angola 189 (61.0–439) 817 (266–1820) 17.8 (5.73–41.2) 190 (68.0–415)
  Central African Republic 75.3 (23.8–187) 55.5 (17.8–146) 15.4 (5.01–37.5) 21.6 (8.04–51.4)
  Congo 51.0 (17.4–121) 70.1 (24.4–162) 9.44 (3.39–22.1) 21.2 (8.39–47.5)
  Democratic Republic of the Congo 987 (319–2260) 1710 (565–3870) 198 (63.2–457) 536 (188–1190)
  Equatorial Guinea 25.0 (8.45–58.1) 11.9 (3.24–29.5) 5.12 (1.81–11.8) 4.44 (1.76–9.66)
  Gabon 17.7 (4.99–42.2) 25.3 (6.33–62.9) 3.81 (1.09–9.05) 7.23 (2.20–16.4)
 Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa 2410 (858–5180) 9470 (3410–20700) 337 (122–738) 2460 (982–5360)
  Burundi 8.62 (2.89–19.6) 55.8 (18.3–133) 1.48 (0.495–3.43) 15.1 (5.16–36.4)
  Comoros 2.26 (0.404–7.53) 16.2 (5.98–36.2) 0.453 (0.0865–1.46) 5.29 (2.07–11.7)
  Djibouti 11.2 (3.67–26.1) 17.2 (5.45–41.9) 2.52 (0.856–5.80) 4.98 (1.70–12.0)
  Eritrea 2.86 (0.164–10.2) 57.4 (19.3–126) 0.530 (0.0280–1.95) 14.0 (4.57–30.6)
  Ethiopia 845 (308–1860) 2700 (981–5970) 93.4 (34.9–205) 719 (283–1600)
  Kenya 375 (134–826) 1430 (518–3140) 53.8 (20.2–119) 363 (146–785)
  Madagascar 325 (113–755) 510 (168–1180) 48.4 (16.9–112) 175 (64.1–389)
  Malawi 64.0 (18.0–154) 539 (184–1220) 10.3 (2.94–24.7) 129 (47.1–289)
  Mozambique 82.7 (25.0–200) 967 (337–2170) 7.69 (2.29–20.0) 231 (85.3–523)
  Rwanda 9.69 (2.91–23.4) 212 (62.9–506) 1.30 (0.387–3.36) 43.4 (13.6–101)
  Somalia 137 (35.9–341) 478 (154–1120) 31.6 (9.20–75.9) 118 (42.5–266)
  South Sudan 88.3 (26.2–230) 107 (30.2–276) 18.2 (5.48–47.5) 38.1 (12.5–95.6)
  Uganda 59.5 (20.2–133) 714 (231–1630) 4.60 (1.56–10.5) 164 (60.0–370)
  United Republic of Tanzania 282 (102–606) 1150 (417–2530) 45.9 (16.9–99.0) 303 (119–657)
  Zambia 119 (38.1–283) 511 (179–1190) 16.7 (5.41–40.2) 131 (49.4–304)
 Southern Sub-Saharan Africa 492 (184–1070) 1820 (664–4000) 71.8 (27.4–154) 470 (193–996)
  Botswana 1.14 (0.414–2.51) 61.0 (16.1–150) 0.111 (0.0414–0.245) 12.1 (3.21–29.6)
  Eswatini 6.20 (2.18–14.3) 26.1 (6.57–68.6) 0.886 (0.318–2.04) 6.40 (1.79–16.8)
  Lesotho 7.06 (2.42–16.3) 46.5 (11.0–112) 0.882 (0.305–2.00) 12.1 (3.19–29.3)
  Namibia 6.49 (2.28–14.7) 59.0 (17.9–138) 0.734 (0.267–1.66) 13.8 (4.77–32.1)
  South Africa 419 (157–898) 1170 (437–2520) 62.1 (24.2–132) 323 (136–686)
  Zimbabwe 51.7 (16.4–125) 460 (134–1100) 7.11 (2.26–17.2) 103 (32.8–242)
 Western Sub-Saharan Africa 4580 (1680–9970) 6970 (2520–15600) 900 (341–1970) 2170 (887–4710)
  Benin 36.7 (10.3–102) 112 (32.1–261) 6.92 (1.98–19.5) 24.5 (7.02–60.1)
  Burkina Faso 136 (42.3–350) 378 (134–860) 28.0 (8.14–71.4) 120 (45.6–281)
  Cabo Verde 4.69 (1.45–11.8) 10.4 (3.55–24.8) 0.600 (0.164–1.53) 3.22 (1.17–7.57)
  Cameroon 189 (19.4–462) 465 (29.9–1320) 40.6 (4.11–98.3) 126 (8.46–355)
  Chad 153 (38.5–412) 145 (38.8–356) 32.6 (7.92–88.4) 56.9 (16.6–137)
  Côte d’Ivoire 280 (81.3–671) 424 (138–977) 56.6 (17.2–139) 111 (42.6–247)
  Gambia 27.8 (9.19–62.7) 44.3 (13.4–106) 3.37 (1.17–7.38) 12.7 (4.51–28.0)
  Ghana 273 (94.6–624) 541 (186–1320) 47.2 (17.0–109) 155 (58.9–368)
  Guinea 143 (45.2–351) 266 (76.9–628) 26.9 (8.77–66.4) 67.9 (23.9–149)
  Guinea-Bissau 27.9 (9.00–67.7) 18.9 (3.13–57.1) 6.00 (1.90–15.0) 5.87 (1.89–15.4)
  Liberia 49.2 (15.7–114) 68.5 (21.5–178) 10.2 (3.34–23.2) 17.0 (6.33–39.6)
  Mali 195 (52.5–478) 369 (125–886) 43.8 (11.8–107) 121 (43.7–289)
  Mauritania 27.1 (9.17–66.0) 75.4 (23.3–180) 5.52 (1.86–13.8) 20.1 (6.66–46.8)
  Niger 115 (27.2–295) 233 (76.0–530) 29.4 (6.83–76.0) 78.5 (26.2–182)
  Nigeria 2700 (992–5980) 3240 (1160–7100) 519 (192–1160) 1100 (449–2390)
  Sao Tome and Principe 2.12 (0.670–5.43) 1.95 (0.396–5.38) 0.487 (0.158–1.25) 0.539 (0.201–1.16)
  Senegal 110 (40.1–253) 394 (144–891) 19.1 (7.23–43.9) 105 (40.6–232)
  Sierra Leone 87.3 (28.7–211) 39.6 (13.9–94.4) 19.3 (6.27–47.0) 16.5 (6.60–36.6)
  Togo 27.9 (9.29–65.4) 145 (49.7–331) 4.27 (1.46–9.71) 32.8 (12.4–72.8)

Among COVID patients who develop long COVID in 2020 and 2021, 15.1% (10.3–21.1) continued to have persistent symptoms at 12 months after COVID infection, or 21.0 million (9.19–41.7) people. In the United States, the Social Security Administration is mandated to financially assist those who are still unable to work after 12 months, corresponding to 946,000 (365,000–2,130,000) people aged 20–64 in the US in 2021 and 2022.

Discussion

A substantial proportion of COVID-19 patients do not recover after the initial infection. We estimated that 144.7 million (54.7–312.6) cases globally in 2020 and 2021 suffered from one or more of three common symptom clusters of long COVID. The risk of long COVID is greater in females and in those with more severe initial infection. The peak ages of those experiencing long COVID were between 20 and 29 years. This pattern by age and sex is distinct from that of severe acute infection, which affects more males and increases with age.48 From seventeen follow-up studies that included children, we also know that long COVID affects a lower but substantial number of children, while severe acute infection is very uncommon at younger ages.4951 These differences suggests that the underlying mechanism of long COVID may be different from that of the severity of acute infection.

A prolonged state of low-grade infection with a hyperimmune response, coagulation/vasculopathy, endocrine and autonomic dysregulation, and a maladaptation of the angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) pathway have been postulated as the underlying pathophysiology of long COVID.52 Deconditioning due to prolonged immobilization during hospitalization may compound these problems.53 Direct tissue damage due to COVID-19 has been demonstrated in many parts of the body, including the lung, heart, kidney, and brain.5459 Due to the large reserves in capacity of most body organs, tissue damage does not immediately lead to symptomatic disease. It may, however, become apparent over time that COVID-19 will contribute to an earlier onset and greater occurrence of long-term symptomatic major organ disease with increasing age or if these organs become diseased by other mechanisms. The rate of recovery from long COVID, moreover, suggests that less permanent factors may underlie these debilitating symptoms.

We have adopted the WHO case definition which stipulates a minimum period of three months after infection before calling ongoing symptoms long COVID or post-COVID-19 condition. Others have suggested a threshold of three weeks to define a case of long COVID, arguing that no competent virus has been replicated beyond three weeks of infection, but a period of up to 12 weeks has been suggested to define the start of long COVID.12,52,60 This analysis accounts for COVID infections through the end of 2021 and therefore does not cover the omicron wave, and it is currently unclear what the risk of long COVID is after infection with omicron. The large proportion of asymptomatic infections with omicron and the fact that if symptoms arise they mostly affect the upper airways suggests that the risk of long COVID will be much smaller.

The recovery pattern among community cases for the three symptom clusters quantified suggests that the majority of cases resolve, a sign of hope for those experiencing these debilitating symptoms. It is not yet clear if there is a smaller proportion of patients, especially among those with more severe acute episodes, who develop a more chronic course of long COVID. Given that the longest follow-up time among the studies we examined was 12 months, the true long-term pattern of recovery will only be revealed as studies conduct longer follow-up periods. The time-limited course of long COVID in most cases has led to the advice to provide rehabilitative support in the community, with specialist rehabilitation services required only for those with protracted and more severe problems, particularly when compounded by post-intensive care syndrome.12,61 Important to patients is that they feel empathy and recognition from healthcare workers even if they can only provide symptomatic and supportive care.62 Quantifying the number of incident and prevalent cases of long COVID will help policy makers ensure adequate access to services to guide patients towards recovery, return to the workplace or schooling, and restoration of their mental health and social life. The attention given to long COVID may also provide greater recognition to patients who suffer from the longer-term consequences of other infectious diseases and who may have received less attention from health services. The large number of people affected by long COVID should also create new opportunities to unravel phenotypical and genotypical characteristics, with an aim to find new treatments and predictors of post-acute disease syndromes including those known to occur after other infectious disease and intensive care for other critical illness.

The main strength of this study is the willingness of researchers from ten follow-up studies to share data and analyses with consistent approaches to deal with the diverse study methods and instruments. This collaborative effort also allowed us to go beyond the reporting of individual symptoms or counts of symptoms reported in the literature. With access to individual patient data, we were able to define clusters of symptoms that frequently occur together and to quantify the overlap among symptom clusters. Importantly, we were able to correct for over-reporting from studies that did not have a comparison with previous health status, leveraging information from the cohort studies that explicitly asked respondents to recall their pre-COVID health status or existence of symptoms. In addition, the very large health insurance databases from the USA allowed us to identify controls matched on demographic and disease characteristics and thus correct for the occurrence of these symptoms unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This may in part explain why our estimates of long COVID are lower than often reported in the literature. Direct comparisons are not easy, as we have defined clusters of symptoms that are not reported by others. However, we think this is a strength of this analysis in comparison to studies reporting individual symptoms or counts of symptoms.

There are also important limitations to our analysis. First, the uncertainty intervals around the estimates are wide, reflecting as yet limited and heterogeneous data. Second, we had to derive separate algorithms for each contributing study to achieve consistency in case definitions of the three chosen symptom clusters. Efforts to achieve standardization of questions and instruments for studies of long COVID are underway.5,63 This would make pooling estimates among studies less prone to measurement bias. Third, we assumed that long COVID follows a similar course in all countries and territories. We used data from western European countries, Iran, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Australia, and the USA. Additional reports from Brazil and Bangladesh suggest that long COVID similarly affects other parts of the world.21,22 As more information becomes available, we can explore whether there is geographical variation in the occurrence or severity of long COVID. We also note that the duration estimates relied on studies from high income countries only. With repeated follow-up being planned in many of the studies and with new studies appearing, it will become clearer over time how generalizable our findings on duration are. Fourth, apart from symptoms and symptom clusters, new diseases have been reported to occur more frequently in patients after COVID-19 diagnosis, including cardiovascular complications like myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, and thrombo-embolic events as well as kidney, liver, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and skin disorders.6466 The data sources to quantify these COVID-19-related changes may not yet be sufficient due to lags in reporting of clinical informatics data, disease registries, or surveys, which form the basis of estimation for such diseases. Fifth, with limited follow-up time available, the pattern of recovery cannot yet be fully described. Importantly, longer follow-up can reveal if there is a subset of cases that go on to have a protracted course of long COVID and need longer care. Sixth, we made the assumption that long COVID only affects those with a symptomatic course of the initial infection. The participating cohorts included few asymptomatic cases: the Faroe Islands, Zurich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort, HAARVI, Rome ISARIC pediatrics and adults cohorts observed 22, 182, 9, 27, and 26 asymptomatic COVID cases, respectively. Long COVID was not identified among asymptomatic cases that were followed in HAARVI and Rome ISARIC cohorts. In the Faroe Islands and Zurich SARS-CoV-2 cohorts, three and five of their asymptomatic cases, respectively, developed at least one long COVID symptom cluster at follow-up. The total number of asymptomatic cases followed in these studies is very low and we chose to be cautious and exclude them from our calculations. In a review of medical records in the University of California COvid Research Data Set (UC CORDS), 32% of those with long COVID symptoms at two months after a positive PCR test reported no symptoms at testing, but it is not clear how many of these developed acute symptoms after testing.60 Seventh, we chose three commonly reported symptom clusters but have not quantified other common symptoms. The main symptoms of our three symptom clusters are those that reached the highest degree of consensus in the Delphi process WHO used to create a clinical case definition for post COVID-19 condition.5 In the most complete cohort, the Sechenov StopCOVID cohort, we had information on a wide range of symptoms and general health status with explicit comparison with the pre-COVID-19 status (eSection 5). Among 1309 respondents with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 needing hospitalization, 136 qualified for at least one of our three symptom clusters of long COVID at six months follow-up. Another 62 respondents reported not having fully recovered. Of these, 48 reported at least one symptom of our three symptom clusters but had failed to meet all criteria by reporting either no or slight problems with usual activities or no worsening of this item compared to before COVID-19. Other more common symptoms that were reported by this group included problems with vision, sleep problems, loss of smell, palpitations, and hair loss. Quantifying vision loss requires measurement of visual acuity, which is not measured in long COVID studies. There are no DWs for loss of smell, hair loss, or palpitations. While there is a disability weight for insomnia, it has not been used in any GBD study as sleep disorders are not (yet) included in the GBD cause list. Estimates therefore do not reflect the burden of the full range of long COVID outcomes.

Conclusion

We have quantified the frequency at which common symptom clusters of long COVID have occurred across the world and made an estimate of their severity and expected duration. Many countries and territories have already responded by setting up specialized treatment centers for those affected.67,68 Understanding the magnitude of the problem will help other countries and territories to respond likewise. Early studies indicate that for most patients with long COVID, there is hope for recovery, but time will tell if all patients recover. The attention given to long COVID during this pandemic should trigger research into the underlying pathology and potential treatment or prevention, the long-term trajectory of long COVID, the potential transition from long COVID into chronic fatigue syndrome, the level of protection from vaccination and the risk of long COVID following more recent omicron variants. Such research may also benefit those who experience similar outcomes following a range of other infectious diseases, an issue that has not received much attention from clinical and global heath communities.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.pdf (253.5KB, pdf)

Key Points.

Question:

What are the extent and nature of the most common long COVID symptoms by country in 2020 and 2021?

Findings:

Globally, 144.7 million people experienced one or more of three symptom clusters (fatigue; cognitive problems; and ongoing respiratory problems) of long COVID three months after infection, in 2020 and 2021. Most cases arose from milder infections. At 12 months after infection, 15.1% of these cases had not yet recovered.

Meaning:

The substantial number of people with long COVID are in need of rehabilitative care and support to transition back into the workplace or education when symptoms start to wane.

Acknowledgments

Declaration of interests

C Adolph reports support for the present manuscript from the Benificus Foundation. P Bobkova, A Gamirova, A Shikhaleva, and A Svistunov report grants from the British Embassy in Moscow ‘StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients’ 2020–2021” paid to Sechenov University, outside the submitted work. X Dai reports support for the present manuscript from Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, paid to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. A Flaxman report stock options from Agathos, Ltd., and provides technical advising on simulation modeling for Janssen, SwissRe, Merck for Mothers, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. R Frithiof reports support for the present manuscript from The Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Kidney Foundation, paid to Uppsala University. N Fullman reports funding from WHO for consultant work in 2019 and funding from Gates Ventures since 2020, outside the submitted work. A Gamirova reports grants and contracts from the British Embassy in Moscow (PI): ‘StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients’ 2020–2021, paid to Sechenov University. J Haagsma reports grants from the EuroQol Foundation, outside the submitted work. M Heijenbrok-Kal and R van den Berg-Emons report support for the present manuscript from ZonMW Program COVID-19, Laurens, and Rijndam Rehabilitation, paid to Erasmus MC. M Hultström reports support for the present manuscript from Knut and Alice Wallenburg Foundation, Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, and Swedish Society of Medicine, paid to Uppsala University. M Lipcsey reports grants or contracts from Hjärt-lungfonden Sweden and is a member of the PROFLO RCT and COVID-19_HBO data safety monitoring boards, outside the submitted work. D Munblit reports report grants from the British Embassy in Moscow ‘StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients’ 2020–2021”, Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant ‘Cell therapy and prevention of ARDS during COVID infection: from basic science to clinical practice’ 2020–2022, all paid to Sechenov University, and was awarded a UK Research and Innovation/National Institute for Health Research grant, payment for lectures given to Merch Sharp & Dohme and Bayer, and reports unpaid leadership positions as co-chair of International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) Global Paediatric Long COVID Working Group and co-lead of the PC-COS project aiming to define the Core Outcome Set for Long-COVID in collaborator from WHO, and is a member of the ISARIC working group on long-term COVID follow-up in adults, all outside the submitted work. S Nomura reports support for the present manuscript from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. M S Petersen reports support for the present manuscript from Cooperation’s p/f Krunborg and Borgartun, grants or contracts from the Velux Foundation, special COVID-10 funding from the Faroese Research Council, the Faroese Parkinson’s association, and the Faroese Health Insurance Fund, participation on the Board of the Faroese National Data Protection Authority, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Wantai Total Ab ELISA, outside the submitted work. M Puhan reports support from the University of Zurich Foundation and the Department of Health, Canton of Zurich. A Shikhaleva reports grants and contracts from the British Embassy in Moscow (PI):’StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients’ 2020–2021, paid to Sechenov University. E Spiridonova reports grants and contracts from the British Embassy in Moscow (PI):’StopCOVID Cohort: Clinical Characterisation of Russian Patients’ 2020–2021, paid to Sechenov University. A Svistunov reports a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grant ‘Cell therapy and prevention of ARDS during COVID infection: from basic science to clinical practice’ 2020–2022, paid to Sechenov University. R van den Berg-Emons reports support for the present manuscript from ZonMW Program COVID-19, grant for CO-FLOW study project number 10430022010026, Laurens funding for the CO-FLOW study, and from Rijndam Rehabilitation for the CO-FLOW study, all paid to Erasmus MC.

Author access to data

TV and SWH had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. DB, DaM, DeM, DoM, FS, MeH, MiH, MS, NM, NS, RH, and ZA were responsible for the data collection of the ten collaborating cohort studies. ZA was responsible for the data collection and matching of the administrative data from Veterans Affairs.

Data sharing

All tabulated input data are available upon publication as Supplementary Appendix Data Inputs. Proposals to access de-identified individual-level data up to one year after publication for researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for individual participant data meta-analysis should be directed to swulf@uw.edu.

Sources of funding and support

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The COFLOW study is funded by the COVID-19 Program Care and Prevention of The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant number 10430022010026), and Rijndam Rehabilitation and Laurens (both in Rotterdam, The Netherlands). A Ferrari and D F Santomauro D F Santomauro are affiliated with the Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, which receives core funding from the Department of Health, Queensland Government. C Adolph gratefully acknowledges support from the Benificus Foundation. C Wiysonge’s work is supported by the South African Medical Research Council. H Xu received support from the National Institute on Aging (R21AG061142; R03AG064303) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD012530). R C Reiner’s and A Aravkin’s work was partially supported by NSF Rapid grant #2031096. N Sarrafzadegan, S Haghjooy Javanmard, and N Mohammadifard report support for the Isfahan cohort study from grant number 199093 from the IUMS, grant number RPPH 20 76 from the WHO/EMR, grant number 996353 from the National Institute of Health Researches of Iran, and grant number 99008516 from the Iran National Science Foundation. M S Petersen reports support for the present manuscript from Cooperation’s p/f Krunborg and Borgartun, grants or contracts from the Velux Foundation, special COVID-10 funding from the Faroese Research Council, the Faroese Parkinson’s association, and the Faroese Health Insurance Fund. For this work, Lorenzo Monasta received supported from the Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy, in collaboration with the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.

Role of the funding source

The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or the writing of the report. Members of the core research team for this topic area had full access to the underlying data used to generate estimates presented in this paper. All other authors had access and reviewed estimates as part of the research evaluation process, which includes additional stages of formal review.

References

  • 1.Collins FS. NIH launches new initiative to study “Long COVID.” National Institutes of Health (NIH). Published February 23, 2021. Accessed June 7, 2021. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-launches-new-initiative-study-long-covid
  • 2.Mendelson M, Nel J, Blumberg L, et al. Long-COVID: An evolving problem with an extensive impact. South Afr Med J Suid-Afr Tydskr Vir Geneeskd. 2020;111(1):10–12. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v111i11.15433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nittas V, Puhan M, Gao M, West E. Long COVID: Evolving Definitions, Burden of Disease and Socio-Economic Consequences. Swiss School of Public Health; 2021. Accessed June 7, 2021. https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/situation-schweiz-und-international/forschung-wissenschaft.html [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martimbianco ALC, Pacheco RL, Bagattini ÂM, Riera R. Frequency, signs and symptoms, and criteria adopted for long COVID-19: A systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. n/a(n/a):e14357. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus, 6 October 2021. Accessed November 5, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1
  • 6.Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made Long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2021;268:113426. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Komaroff AL. Advances in Understanding the Pathophysiology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. JAMA. 2019;322(6):499–500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moldofsky H, Patcai J. Chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, depression and disordered sleep in chronic post-SARS syndrome; a case-controlled study. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hickie I, Davenport T, Wakefield D, et al. Post-infective and chronic fatigue syndromes precipitated by viral and non-viral pathogens: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2006;333(7568):575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38933.585764.AE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Komaroff AL, Bateman L. Will COVID-19 Lead to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? Front Med. 2021;7. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.606824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.CDC. COVID-19 and Your Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 11, 2020. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects.html
  • 12.Greenhalgh T, Knight M, A’Court C, Buxton M, Husain L. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ. 2020;370:m3026. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Venkatesan P. NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(2):129. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00031-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sykes DL, Holdsworth L, Jawad N, Gunasekera P, Morice AH, Crooks MG. Post-COVID-19 Symptom Burden: What is Long-COVID and How Should We Manage It? Lung. 2021;199(2):113–119. doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00423-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ladds E, Rushforth A, Wieringa S, et al. Developing services for long COVID: lessons from a study of wounded healers. Clin Med. 2021;21(1):59–65. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vanichkachorn G, Newcomb R, Cowl CT, et al. Post COVID-19 Syndrome (Long Haul Syndrome): Description of a Multidisciplinary Clinic at the Mayo Clinic and Characteristics of the Initial Patient Cohort. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;0(0). doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nasserie T, Hittle M, Goodman SN. Assessment of the Frequency and Variety of Persistent Symptoms Among Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e2111417. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cirulli ET, Barrett KMS, Riffle S, et al. Long-term COVID-19 symptoms in a large unselected population. medRxiv. Published online December 1, 2020:2020.10.07.20208702. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.07.20208702 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.UK Coronavirus Infection Survey. Updated estimates of the prevalence of long COVID symptoms - Office for National Statistics. Published January 21, 2021. Accessed February 2, 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandlifeexpectancies/adhocs/12788updatedestimatesoftheprevalenceoflongcovidsymptoms
  • 20.Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):626–631. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01292-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barreto APA, Duarte LC, Cerqueira-Silva T, et al. Post-Acute COVID Syndrome, the Aftermath of Mild to Severe COVID-19 in Brazilian Patients. medRxiv. Published online June 9, 2021:2021.06.07.21258520. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258520 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mahmud R, Rahman MM, Rassel MA, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome among symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study in a tertiary care center of Bangladesh. PloS One. 2021;16(4):e0249644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, et al. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement. PLOS Med. 2016;13(6):e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barber RM, Sorensen RJD, Pigott DM, et al. Estimating global, regional, and national daily and cumulative infections with SARS-CoV-2 through Nov 14, 2021: a statistical analysis. The Lancet. 2022;0(0). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00484-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang H, Paulson KR, Pease SA, et al. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. The Lancet. 2022;399(10334):1513–1536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Variation in the COVID-19 infection–fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022;399(10334):1469–1488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02867-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oran DP, Topol EJ. Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Ann Intern Med. Published online June 3, 2020:M20–3012. doi: 10.7326/M20-3012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Salomon JA, Haagsma JA, Davis A, et al. Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(11):e712–723. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00069-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Michelen M, Cheng V, Manoharan L, et al. Characterising long term Covid-19: a living systematic review | medRxiv. Accessed August 24, 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.08.20246025v2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mao W, Vos T, Wulf Hanson S, et al. Long-term and short-term disease burden of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020210101. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=210101 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.ISRCTN Registry. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.isrctn.com/
  • 33.A global healthcare intelligence partner. PRA Health Sciences. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://prahs.com/ [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Al-Aly Z, Xie Y, Bowe B. High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Nature. 2021;594(7862):259–264. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03553-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.VA research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.research.va.gov/covid-19.cfm
  • 36.GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;396(10258):1223–1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zheng P, Barber R, Sorensen RJD, Murray CJL, Aravkin AY. Trimmed Constrained Mixed Effects Models: Formulations and Algorithms. ArXiv190910700 Math Stat. Published online October 27, Accessed June 15, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10700 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Puhan M, Fehr J, Abela I, et al. Zurich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort: Towards a long-term control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission - Identifying the epidemiological, immunological and viral genetic drivers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and pathogenesis in a representative population-based cohort. Accessed June 11, 2021. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14990068
  • 39.Petersen MS, Kristiansen MF, Hanusson KD, et al. Long COVID in the Faroe Islands - a longitudinal study among non-hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. Published online November 30, 2020:ciaa1792. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Molteni E, Sudre CH, Canas LS, et al. Illness duration and symptom profile in symptomatic UK school-aged children tested for SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. Published online August 3, 2021:S2352–4642(21)00198-X. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00198-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Hellemons ME, et al. CO-FLOW: COvid-19 Follow-up care paths and Long-term Outcomes Within the Dutch health care system: study protocol of a multicenter prospective cohort study following patients 2 years after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):847. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8710. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06813-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.ESRI Nederland. Coronavirus IC en verpleegafdeling-opnamen (Stichting NICE). Accessed May 4, 2021. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/e58fd5e1779b4cdd9d81e44b9b1032d0
  • 43.Jun 14 P, 2021. State COVID-19 Data and Policy Actions. KFF. Published June 14, 2021. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/state-covid-19-data-and-policy-actions/
  • 44.Ministerie van Volksgezondheid W en S. Besmette verpleeghuizen | Coronadashboard | Rijksoverheid.nl. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://coronadashboard.rijksoverheid.nl
  • 45.De Federale overheidsdienst (FOD) Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Belgium. Coronavirus Covid-19. COVID-19 Weekly report. Published June 11, 2021. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://covid-19.sciensano.be/sites/default/files/Covid19/COVID-19_Weekly_report_NL.pdf
  • 46.Tableau de bord COVID-19. Tableau de bord COVID-19. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://dashboard.covid19.data.gouv.fr
  • 47.Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sorensen RJD, Carter A, Welgan CA, et al. Variation in the COVID-19 infection-fatality rate by age, time and geography during the pre-vaccine era. Lancet. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Buonsenso D, Munblit D, De Rose C, et al. Preliminary evidence on long COVID in children. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2021;110(7):2208–2211. doi: 10.1111/apa.15870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ludvigsson JF. Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID-19. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2021;110(3):914–921. doi: 10.1111/apa.15673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Osmanov IM, Spiridonova E, Bobkova P, et al. Risk factors for long covid in previously hospitalised children using the ISARIC Global follow-up protocol: A prospective cohort study. medRxiv. Published online April 26, 2021:2021.04.26.21256110. doi: 10.1101/2021.04.26.21256110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):601–615. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Candan SA, Elibol N, Abdullahi A. Consideration of prevention and management of long-term consequences of post-acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(6):663–668. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1766181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2021;397(10270):220–232. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shah AS, Wong AW, Hague CJ, et al. A prospective study of 12-week respiratory outcomes in COVID-19-related hospitalisations. Thorax. 2021;76(4):402–404. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lindner D, Fitzek A, Bräuninger H, et al. Association of Cardiac Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in Confirmed COVID-19 Autopsy Cases. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1281–1285. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Golmai P, Larsen CP, DeVita MV, et al. Histopathologic and Ultrastructural Findings in Postmortem Kidney Biopsy Material in 12 Patients with AKI and COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2020;31(9):1944–1947. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sharma P, Uppal NN, Wanchoo R, et al. COVID-19–Associated Kidney Injury: A Case Series of Kidney Biopsy Findings. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(9):1948–1958. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ameres M, Brandstetter S, Toncheva AA, et al. Association of neuronal injury blood marker neurofilament light chain with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. J Neurol. 2020;267(12):3476–3478. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10050-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Huang Y, Pinto MD, Borelli JL, et al. COVID Symptoms, Symptom Clusters, and Predictors for Becoming a Long-Hauler: Looking for Clarity in the Haze of the Pandemic. MedRxiv Prepr Serv Health Sci. Published online March 5, 2021:2021.03.03.21252086. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.03.21252086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–509. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.“Just stay at home” was lonely and terrifying | The BMJ. Accessed June 9, 2021. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3807?ijkey=adc0934f8f53845e3c6ce83055645b4550903af4&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 63.COMET Initiative | Core Outcome Measures for Post-Covid condition/Long Covid. Accessed August 24, 2021. https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1847
  • 64.Long B, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(7):1504–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(7):1017–1032. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0968-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hultström M, Lipcsey M, Wallin E, Larsson IM, Larsson A, Frithiof R. Severe acute kidney injury associated with progression of chronic kidney disease after critical COVID-19. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03461-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.CNN TW. Clinics are springing up around the country for what some call a potential second pandemic: Long Covid. CNN. Accessed June 29, 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/health/long-covid-clinics/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • 68.CNN LSS Jo Shelley and Livia Borghese. Brain fog, fatigue, breathlessness. Rehab centers set up across Europe to treat long-term effects of coronavirus. CNN. Accessed June 29, 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/19/health/long-covid-italy-uk-gbr-intl/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rass V, Beer R, Schiefecker AJ, et al. Neurological outcome and quality of life 3 months after COVID-19: A prospective observational cohort study. Eur J Neurol. Published online March 7, doi: 10.1111/ene.14803. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04416100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sarrafzadegan N, Mohammadifard N, Haghjooy Javanmard S, et al. “Isfahan COVID Cohort” Study: Rationale, Methodology and Initial results. J Res Med Sci. Published online in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kurth F, Roennefarth M, Thibeault C, et al. Studying the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019: a protocol for the Berlin prospective COVID-19 patient cohort (Pa-COVID-19). Infection. 2020;48(4):619–626. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021688. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01464-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thibeault C, Mühlemann B, Helbig ET, et al. Clinical and virological characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in a German tertiary care centre during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a prospective observational study. Infection. Published online April 22, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01594-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hultström M, Frithiof R, Lipcsey M. PRONMED Uppsala COVID-19 ICU Biobank. Published March 18, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04474249
  • 74.Ekbom E, Frithiof R, ÖI E, et al. Impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide is common in critically ill Covid-19 patients at four months postdischarge. Respir Med. 2021;182:106394. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Munblit D, Bobkova P, Spiridonova E, et al. Asthma is associated with Long Covid in previously hospitalised adults: StopCOVID cohort study. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. Published online in review. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, et al. Sequelae in Adults at 6 Months After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Anastasio F, Barbuto S, Scarnecchia E, et al. Medium-term impact of COVID-19 on pulmonary function, functional capacity and quality of life. Eur Respir J. Published online January 1, 2021. doi: 10.1183/13993003.04015-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zayet S, Zahra H, Royer PY, et al. Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Nine Months after SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Cohort of 354 Patients: Data from the First Wave of COVID-19 in Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, France. Microorganisms. 2021;9(8):1719. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Arnold DT, Hamilton FW, Milne A, et al. Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: results from a prospective UK cohort. Thorax. Published online December 3, 2020. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Asadi-Pooya AA, Nemati H, Shahisavandi M, et al. Long COVID in children and adolescents. World J Pediatr WJP. Published online September 3, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00457-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Becker C, Beck K, Zumbrunn S, et al. Long COVID 1 year after hospitalisation for COVID-19: a prospective bicentric cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30091. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bellan M, Soddu D, Balbo PE, et al. Respiratory and Psychophysical Sequelae Among Patients With COVID-19 Four Months After Hospital Discharge. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2036142. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Berg SK, Nielsen SD, Nygaard U, et al. Long COVID symptoms in SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents and matched controls (LongCOVIDKidsDK): a national, cross-sectional study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(4):240–248. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00004-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Carvalho-Schneider C, Laurent E, Lemaignen A, et al. Follow-up of adults with noncritical COVID-19 two months after symptom onset. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;27(2):258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chopra N, Chowdhury M, Singh AK, et al. Clinical predictors of long COVID-19 and phenotypes of mild COVID-19 at a tertiary care centre in India. Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(3):156–161. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chopra V, Flanders SA, O’Malley M, Malani AN, Prescott HC. Sixty-Day Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(4):576–578. doi: 10.7326/M20-5661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stephenson T, Shafran R, De Stavola B, et al. Long COVID and the mental and physical health of children and young people: national matched cohort study protocol (the CLoCk study). BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e052838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lombardo MDM, Foppiani A, Peretti GM, et al. Long-Term Coronavirus Disease 2019 Complications in Inpatients and Outpatients: A One-Year Follow-up Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(8):ofab384. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group, Morin L, Savale L, et al. Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA. 2021;325(15):1525–1534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ayoubkhani D, Pawelek P, Bosworth M. Prevalence of ongoing symptoms following coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in the UK - Office for National Statistics. Published August 5, 2021. Accessed August 24, 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/prevalenceofongoingsymptomsfollowingcoronaviruscovid19infectionintheuk/5august2021
  • 92.Darcis G, Bouquegneau A, Maes N, et al. Long-term clinical follow-up of patients suffering from moderate-to-severe COVID-19 infection: a monocentric prospective observational cohort study. Int J Infect Dis IJID Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2021;109:209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dryden M, Mudara C, Vika C, et al. LONG COVID IN SOUTH AFRICA: FINDINGS FROM A LONGITUDINAL COHORT OF PATIENTS AT ONE MONTH AFTER HOSPITALISATION WITH SARS-CoV-2, USING AN ISARIC MULTI-COUNTRY PROTOCOL. 19(0800):23. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Elkan M, Dvir A, Zaidenstein R, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Hospitalization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Among COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:4829–4836. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S323316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.García-Abellán J, Padilla S, Fernández-González M, et al. Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 is Associated with Long-term Clinical Outcome in Patients with COVID-19: a Longitudinal Study. J Clin Immunol. Published online July 17, 2021:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10875-021-01083-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, et al. Postdischarge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(6):e4–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):1013–1022. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Heesakkers H, van der Hoeven JG, Corsten S, et al. Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With 1-Year Survival Following Intensive Care Unit Treatment for COVID-19. JAMA. 2022;327(6):559–565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Horwitz LI, Garry K, Prete AM, et al. Six-Month Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Severe COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med. Published online August 5, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07032-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Jacobson KB, Rao M, Bonilla H, et al. Patients With Uncomplicated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Have Long-Term Persistent Symptoms and Functional Impairment Similar to Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Cautionary Tale During a Global Pandemic. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2021;73(3):e826–e829. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kayaaslan B, Eser F, Kalem AK, et al. Post-COVID syndrome: A single-center questionnaire study on 1007 participants recovered from COVID-19. J Med Virol. Published online July 13, 2021. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Klein H, Asseo K, Karni N, et al. Onset, duration and unresolved symptoms, including smell and taste changes, in mild COVID-19 infection: a cohort study in Israeli patients. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Published online February 16, 2021:S1198–743X(21)00083–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lerum TV, Aaløkken TM, Brønstad E, et al. Dyspnoea, lung function and CT findings 3 months after hospital admission for COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(4):2003448. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03448-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mandal S, Barnett J, Brill SE, et al. “Long-COVID”: a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Thorax. Published online November 10, 2020. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Moreno-Pérez O, Merino E, Leon-Ramirez JM, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Incidence and risk factors: A Mediterranean cohort study. J Infect. 2021;82(3):378–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Naik S, Haldar SN, Soneja M, et al. Post COVID-19 sequelae: A prospective observational study from Northern India. Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(5):254–260. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Peghin M, Palese A, Venturini M, et al. Post-COVID-19 symptoms 6 months after acute infection among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Published online June 7, 2021:S1198–743X(21)00281–0. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Say D, Crawford N, McNab S, Wurzel D, Steer A, Tosif S. Post-acute COVID-19 outcomes in children with mild and asymptomatic disease. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(6):e22–e23. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00124-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sibila O, Albacar N, Perea L, et al. Lung Function sequelae in COVID-19 Patients 3 Months After Hospital Discharge. Arch Bronconeumol. 2021;57:59–61. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.01.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sigfrid L, Drake TM, Pauley E, et al. Long Covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: A prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;8:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Søraas A, Kalleberg KT, Dahl JA, et al. Persisting symptoms three to eight months after non-hospitalized COVID-19, a prospective cohort study. PloS One. 2021;16(8):e0256142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Suárez-Robles M, Iguaran-Bermúdez MDR, García-Klepizg JL, Lorenzo-Villalba N, Méndez-Bailón M. Ninety days post-hospitalization evaluation of residual COVID-19 symptoms through a phone call check list. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37:289. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.289.27110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Taboada M, Cariñena A, Moreno E, et al. Post-COVID-19 functional status six-months after hospitalization. J Infect. 2021;82(4):e31–e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Tleyjeh IM, Saddik B, AlSwaidan N, et al. Prevalence and predictors of Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) after hospital discharge: A cohort study with 4 months median follow-up. PloS One. 2021;16(12):e0260568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Venturelli S, Benatti SV, Casati M, et al. Surviving COVID-19 in Bergamo province: a post-acute outpatient re-evaluation. Epidemiol Infect. 2021;149:e32. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wanga V, Chevinsky JR, Dimitrov LV, et al. Long-Term Symptoms Among Adults Tested for SARS-CoV-2 - United States, January 2020-April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(36):1235–1241. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7036a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Xiong Q, Xu M, Li J, et al. Clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China: a single-centre longitudinal study. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;27(1):89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.pdf (253.5KB, pdf)

Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES