Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;16:866118. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.866118

Table 3.

The Pearson correlations between the EBR’ and MDrow index performed during the DROW conditions per each participant.

Participant ID R value p value
Subject 1 0.3618 0.0963
Subject 2 0.8350 0.0004
Subject 3 0.5806 0.0081
Subject 4 −0.41084 0.2357
Subject 5 0.3688 0.0851
Subject 6 0.7635 0.0007
Subject 7 −0.1844 0.1863
Subject 8 0.8381 0.0003
Subject 9 0.7697 0.0011
Subject 10 0.7017 0.0018
Subject 11 0.6993 0.0027
Subject 12 −0.0819 0.4128
Subject 13 −0.0715 0.3965
Subject 14 0.6721 0.0024
Subject 15 0.3848 0.0753
Subject 16 0.3042 0.0846
Subject 17 0.4866 0.0237
Subject 18 0.2548 0.1028
Subject 19 0.4082 0.0376
Positive and significant correlations 10

Values in bold represent statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations.