Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2021 May 28;155:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.028

Table 1. Cribriform-specific Sensitivity and Specificity for Various Detection Methods.

Sensitivity and specificity of various prostate cancer detection methods in identifying cribriform morphology are outlined. In general, techniques have high specificity and low sensitivity.

Detection Method Sensitivity (cribriform specific) Specificity (cribriform specific)
Systematic Biopsy (SB) 20.7% 37
43% 33
44.7% 35
56.5% 34 		29.2% 37
97% 33
93% 35
87.2% 34
Targeted biopsy (TB) (Fusion Biopsy/MRI-TBx) 28.6% 37
53.5% 34 		32.4% 37
76.5% 34
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT 76% 43 86% 43
Nomogram 79.2% 44 84% 44
Mp-MRI 90.5% 41 *Specificity not calculated due to all MRIs being performed in men with prostate cancer (no control)