Table 2.
Reproductive performance of Hyalomma dromedarii engorged females treated with zinc oxide nanoparticles
| Item | Concentration | Reproductive performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPI | Egg number | Hatchability (%) | ||
| ZnO NPs (mg/ml) | 32 | 0.485 ± 0.022b | 4256.04 ± 179.96bc | 48.53 ± 7.75a |
| 16 | 0.527 ± 0.025b | 3252.8 ± 181.03b | 66.67 ± 5.80ab | |
| 8 | 0.530 ± 0.022b | 3898.3 ± 380.84b | 82.50 ± 3.65bc | |
| 4 | 0.520 ± 0.022b | 4259.1 ± 459.96bc | 89.5 ± 3.29bc | |
| Butox®5.0 (1 ml/l) | 1 | 0.152 ± 0.017a | 623.7 ± 226.3a | 65.9 ± 12.4ab |
| Control | 0.600 ± 0.054b | 5380.26 ± 96.68c | 98.27 ± 0.323c | |
| F 5,48 | 28.855 | 35.614 | 7.071 | |
| P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
EPI egg productive index
a,b,… etcThe significant difference between the mean values of each parameter according to Duncan’s test (P < 0.05)