Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;49(7):2377–2391. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05676-1

Table 3.

Sign test estimates of the differences between AB and FS CEST models for all the investigated metrics: amide signal, amine signal, signal ratio for amides/amines

Group Metric
AB-FS (∆3.5)
Median (25–75 %tile)
p-value
AB-FS (∆2)
Median (25–75 %tile)
p-value
AB-FS_ratio
Median (25–75 %tile)
p-value
NAWM

0.0

(0.0–0.0)

1.0

0.0

(0.0–6.2e-06)

0.21

-
IDH-wild-type

0.003

(0–0.048)

0.29

0.015

(0.005–0.078)

0.0078

− 0.05

(− 0.18–− 0.04)

0.0078

IDH-mutant

0.032

(0.01–0.12)

< 0.0001

0.12

(0.06–0.23)

< 0.0001

− 0.14

(− 0.22–− 0.07)

< 0.0001

IDH-mutant_1p/19qret

0.08

(0.02−0.14)

< 0.0001

0.20

(0.09–0.24)

< 0.0001

− 0.15

(− 0.24–− 0.12)

< 0.0001

IDH-mutant_1p/19qcodel

0.010

(0.0–0.028)

0.0063

0.07

(0.0–0.11)

0.0018

− 0.11

(− 0.16–− 0.01)

0.0001

IDH-mutant_1p/19qret with AB/FS mismatch

0.11

(0.08–0.20)

0.0001

0.22

(0.19–0.38)

0.0001

− 0.19

(− 0.25–− 0.13)

0.0001

IDH-mutant_1p/19qret without AB/FS mismatch

0.018

(0–0.022)

0.22

0.069

(0.001–0.086)

0.016

− 0.081

(− 0.13–− 0.01)

0.016

∆3.5 = [3–4 ppm] = 1-ppm frequency range centred on the amide frequency at 3.5 ppm; ∆2 = [1.5–2.5 ppm] = 1-ppm frequency range centred on the amine frequency at 2 ppm; AB-FS = AB − FS models; ratio = amide/amine ratio. p-values in bold represent statistically significant values. Threshold for significance p = 0.05