Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268640

Table 1. Treatment effect calculations for encouragement and lottery email treatments.

Comparison groups ITT
No email Encouragement email
.1591(N = 15,123) .1797 (N = 3,778) .0207 (p = .002)
No email Lottery email
.1591 (N = 15,123) .2191 (N = 3,779) .0601 (p<.001)
Encouragement email Lottery email
.1797 (N = 3,778) .2191 (N = 3,779) .0394 (p<.001)
Among those opening email ATT
Encouragement email Lottery email
.2030 (N = 2,729) .2677 (N = 2,585) .0647 p<.001)

ITT p-values based on a difference of proportions test using intent-to-treat calculations. ATT p-value based on a difference of proportions test among those opening the treatment emails.