Skip to main content
. 1999 Nov;65(11):4926–4934. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.11.4926-4934.1999

TABLE 2.

Assignment of the nifH clones from the symbiotic microbial community in the gut of termites to phylogenetic groups

Termite species Clone name taga Number of clones
Proteo-cyano Anaerobe anf-methano Pseudo nif Other Frameshiftc Total Different AAd Different DNAe
R. speratusb RSN-TKY 1 18 0 3 0 4 26 13 23
C. formosanus CFN 0 23 0 1 0 0 24 11 15
N. koshunensis NKN 3 5 10 4 0 1 23 12 20
C. domesticus CDN 0 8 10 4 0 1 23 15 21
G. fuscus GFN 0 12 2 6 4 0 24 14 14
H. sjoestedti HSN 0 1 22 0 0 1 24 6 15
N. takasagoensis NTN 0 11 0 12 0 1 24 15 17
O. formosanus OFN 0 0 1 23 0 0 24 7 7
P. nitobei PNN 0 2 0 20 0 0 22 13 16
a

Termite origins of the isolated clones were clarified with these clone name tags. 

b

Numbers of clones derived from R. speratus are cited from reference 28 and are restricted to those amplified with the primer pair of IGK and YAA. 

c

As in the previous report on the analysis of nifH sequences in R. speratus (28), clones having significant similarity to nifH but with frameshift-like mutations, showing no translation of the nifH protein, were isolated from the four termites. 

d

Number of clones with different amino acid (AA) sequences found in a single termite species. 

e

Number of clones with different DNA sequences found in a single termite species.