Table 3.
Parameter values for the best and the worst fittings obtained from subset 0. Modelled arches of this example are shown in Fig. 2.
| Parameter | 3P | NLS | 3P-NLS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fitting with the 3P algorithm | |||
| x (Ω) | 552.9033 | 552.9700 | 552.8850 |
| y (Ω) | − 45.5867 | − 44.9486 | − 45.2311 |
| r (Ω) | 111.4057 | 110.6691 | 110.9531 |
| R0 (Ω) | 654.5551 | 654.1000 | 654.2000 |
| R∞ (Ω) | 451.2515 | 451.8400 | 451.5700 |
| τ (s) | 3.4008E − 06 | 3.4224E − 06 | 3.4155E − 06 |
| α | 0.7316 | 0.7337 | 0.7327 |
| fc (kHz) | 46.7991 | 46.5034 | 46.5983 |
| Worst fitting with the 3P algorithm | |||
| x (Ω) | 647.8615 | 645.3000 | 645.4200 |
| y (Ω) | − 58.3636 | − 61.7126 | − 61.4309 |
| r (Ω) | 137.2768 | 140.8673 | 140.5642 |
| R0 (Ω) | 772.1137 | 771.9300 | 771.8500 |
| R∞ (Ω) | 523.6093 | 518.6700 | 518.9900 |
| τ | 3.4642E − 06 | 3.3463E − 06 | 3.3541E − 06 |
| α | 0.7204 | 0.7113 | 0.7121 |
| fc (kHz) | 45.9428 | 47.5608 | 47.4504 |