Table 2.
Simple effects analyses for interpretation of 2 way Stimulus × Error Type and Session × Stimulus Type interactions. P values are sequential Bonferroni-corrected.
| Group | Stimulus type | Wald χ2 (3) | P value | Interpretation Session 1 vs 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session × Error Type interaction: contrasts within each level of group and stimulus type | ||||
| BMR + Sham | Binge | 2.954 | 0.399 | |
| LPF | 3.200 | 0.362 | ||
| Filler | 0.718 | 0.869 | ||
| BMR + RIT | Binge | 27.707 | < 0.0005 | Reduction in false alarm rate |
| LPF | 4.840 | 0.184 | ||
| Filler | 11.541 | 0.009 | Reduction in miss rate | |
| NR + RIT | Binge | 4.613 | 0.202 | |
| LPF | 5.613 | 0.132 | ||
| Filler | 7.102 | 0.069 | ||
| Group | Error type | Wald χ2 (5) | P value | Interpretation session 1 vs 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session × Stimulus Type interaction: contrasts within each level of group and error type | ||||
| BMR + Sham | Miss | 22.993 | < 0.0005 | Decreased binge food miss rate |
| False alarm | 13.948 | 0.016 | Increased binge food false alarm rate | |
| BMR + RIT | Miss | 25.536 | < 0.0005 | Increased binge food miss rate |
| False alarm | 6.136 | 0.293 | ||
| NR + RIT | Miss | 14.883 | 0.011 | Decreased binge food and filler false alarms |
| False alarm | 8.058 | 0.153 | ||
Significant values are in bold.