Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;2022:4895234. doi: 10.1155/2022/4895234

Table 3.

Comparison of joints angles mean between pre- and postrehabilitation program at swing phase.

Joint angles Swing phase Paired differences t p value Cohen's d
Mean ± SD Mean SD SEM
HA (pre) Acceleration phase 16.26 ± 3.21 22.50% 3.81 0.98 3.72 0.03∗ 0.97
H.A. (post) 19.93 ± 3.08
KA (pre) 45.00 ± 6.4 21.46% 6.29 1.62 5.94 0.01∗ 1.52
KA (post) 55.06 ± 5.09
AA (pre) 9.06 ± 2.01 28.69% 3.15 0.81 3.18 0.03∗ 0.82
A.A. (post) 11.66 ± 2.84
HA (pre) Midswing (swing phase) 23.86 ± 3.96 38.26% 6.73 1.73 5.24 0.01∗ 1.35
HA (post) 33.00 ± 4.48
KA (pre) 23.66 ± 3.67 36.34% 5.40 1.39 6.15 0.01∗ 1.59
KA (post) 32.26 ± 4.28
AA (pre) 0.46 ± 0.51 71.73% 0.89 0.23 1.4 0.17 0.37
A.A. (post) 0.80 ± 0.67
H.A. (pre) Terminal-swing (swing phase) 24.60 ± 3.15 33.86% 5.05 1.30 6.38 0.01∗ 1.65
H.A. (post) 32.93 ± 4.14
KA (pre) 5.86 ± 2.06 94.3%↓ 2.26 0.58 9.46 0.01∗ 2.45
KA (post) 0.33 ± 0.72
A.A. (pre) 1.26 ± 0.45 0.00 0.65 0.16 0.00 1.000 00.00
A.A. (post) 1.26 ± 0.45

HA: hip angle; KA: knee angle; AA: ankle angle; df = 14; ∗significant value if p ≤ 0.05; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error mean; ˆeffect size is large if d = 0.8.