Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 25;70:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.04.007

Table 2.

Adjusted logistic regression results comparing odds of current eating disorder risk and self-reported eating disorder diagnosis by gender identity

Model Variables Endorsed ED Pathology
OR 95% CI p-value Pairwise Comparisons
n %
ED risk
 Gender identity
  1. Trans men 346 34.1 -- -- --
3 > 4
2 = 3, 4
  2. Trans women 152 37.1 1.13 0.89, 1.44 .328
  3. GQ/NC 915 38.8 1.20 1.03, 1.40 .020
  4. Gender expansive 186 34.0 0.97 0.78, 1.21 .804
 Race/Ethnicity
  BIPOC 543 37.3 1.04 0.91, 1.19 .534
  White 1052 36.7 -- -- --
 Age
  18-22 1320 38.7 -- -- --
  23-25 145 31.3 0.69 0.56, 0.86 < .001
  26+ 133 29.0 0.67 0.54, 0.83 < .001

Self-reported ED diagnosis
 Gender identity
  1. Trans men 104 10.5 1.61 1.03, 2.51 .038
1 = 3 = 4
  2. Trans women 24 6.3 -- -- --
  3. GQ/NC 241 11.1 1.75 1.15, 2.66 .009
  4. Gender expansive 64 12.3 1.97 1.22, 3.17 .006
 Race
  BIPOC 119 9.0 0.72 0.58, 0.91 .005
  White 315 11.6 -- -- --
 Age
  18-22 347 11.1 -- -- --
  23-25 47 10.4 0.93 0.67, 1.30 .684
  26+ 40 8.5 0.72 0.50, 1.03 .070

Note. Frequencies represent observed counts; percentages are weighted to account for nonresponse. OR=Odds Ratio; CI=95% confidence interval; ED=eating disorder; BIPOC=Black, Indigenous, or other person of color