Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 1;28(11):2329–2338. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3849

Table 3.

Response rate assessment

Cohort CR/PR SD/PD p-
value#
Cohort B p16 IHC N=42 (%) Positive (N=18) 5 (28) 13 (72) 0.27
Negative (N=24) 11 (46) 13 (54)
PD-L1 IHC N=39 (%) CPS < 1 (N=7) 1 (14) 6 (86) 0.32
CPS 1-19 (N=13) 5 (39) 8 (62)
CPS >= 1 (N=19) 9 (47) 10 (53)
Cohort A + B p16 IHC N=85 (%) Positive (N=39) 7 (18) 32 (82) 0.02
Negative (N=46) 19 (41) 27 (59)
PD-L1 IHC N=76 (%) CPS < 1 (N=14) 1 (7) 13 (93) 0.03
CPS 1-19 (N=26) 7 (27) 19 (73)
CPS >=20 (N=36) 16 (44) 20 (56)
Prior cetuximab or immunotherapy exposure* N=85 (%) Yes (N=29) 6 (21) 23 (79) 0.16
No (N=56) 20 (36) 36 (64)
Platinum resistant disease+ N=85 (%) Yes (N=12) 5 (42) 7 (58) 0.46
No (N=73) 21 (29) 52 (71)
TTMV DNA in plasma N=35 (%) > median (high, N=17) 0 (0) 17 (100) 0.01
< median (low, N=18) 6 (33) 12 (67)

CR: completed response, PR: partial response, SD: stable disease, PD: progressive disease, IHC: immunohistochemical staining, PD-L1: Programmed cell death ligand 1, CPS: combined positive score, TTMV: tumor-tissue-modified human papillomavirus.

*

Exclude cetuximab given with radiation

+

Relapse within 6 months of platinum containing curative therapy

#

p value is derived from the Barnard unconditional test for 2 × 2 tables, and CMH test otherwise.