. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 9.

Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2021 Dec 6;93(3):760–777. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13713

Table 4.

Regressions Predicting Adult Functional Outcomes from Adolescent-era Relationship Qualities and Attachment States of Mind

	Functional Outcomes

	Adult Work Performance						Depressive Symptoms

	Model 1a: Parental Report (Age 26)			Model 1b: Peer-report (Age 24–26)			Model 1c: Self-report (Ages 24–26)

	β entry	β final	R²	β entry	β final	R²	β entry	β final	R²
Step I.
Gender (1=M; 2=F)	.12	.00		.08	.05		.19^*	.26^***
Adol. Family Income	.14	.04		.03	−.02		.00	.08
ΔR² for Step			.030			.006			.035^*
Step II.
Close Friendship Quality (13–17)	.14	.11		.27^***	.27^***		−.31^***	−.30^***
Parent-Teen Relationship Quality (13,16,18)	.15	.10		−.07	−.06		.01	.04
ΔR² for Step			.043			.071^**			.091^***
Step III.
Attachment Security (14)	.31^***	.31^***		.02	.02		−.17^*	−.17^*
ΔR² for Step			.076^***			.000			.019^*
Total R² for Model			.149^**			.077+			.145^***
Likelihood Ratio Difference in Step II. β weights: Cls. Frd.Cmp vs. Parnt-Tn Rel Qual.	1.38			9.35^**			15.67^***

Note:

^***

p < .001.

^**

p < .01.

p ≤ .05.

Close friendship quality was rated by the close friend; Parent-teen relationship quality was rated by parents.