Table 5.
Regressions Predicting Adult-Parent Relationship Outcomes from Adolescent-era Relationship Qualities and Attachment States of Mind
Parent Relationship Quality | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
| ||||||
Model 3a: Self-report (Age 25) | Model 3b: Parent-report (Age 26) | |||||
|
||||||
β entry | β final | R2 | β entry | β final | R2 | |
Step I. | ||||||
Gender (1=M; 2=F) | .12 | .03 | .20 | .12 | ||
Adol. Family Income | .12 | .07 | .26* | .16 | ||
ΔR2 for Step | .024 | .090* | ||||
Step II. | ||||||
Close Friendship Quality (13–17) | .25* | .18* (M−.11 F:.35**) | .19* | .24* | ||
Parent-Teen Relationship Quality (13,16,18) | .08 | .04 (M:−.06; F: .13) | .28** | .27** | ||
ΔR2 for Step | .045* | .121** | ||||
Step III. | ||||||
Attachment Security (14) | .18* | .18* (M:.41***; F:.02) | .07 | .07 | ||
ΔR2 for Step | .031* | .000 | ||||
Total R2 for Model | .100* | .231** | ||||
2.59 | ||||||
Likelihood Ratio Difference in Step II. β weights: Cls. Frd.Cmp vs. Parnt-Tn Rel Qual. | Males: .09; Females: 2.20 |
Note:
p < .001.
p < .01.
p ≤ .05.
Close friendship quality was rated by the close friend; Parent-teen relationship quality was rated by parents. Results of follow-up analyses separately by gender for Model 3a are presented separately for males and females.