Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;13:851213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.851213

Table 6.

Logistic regression analysis of patients with different sizes of CSD.

Parameter (%) (n/N) Crude OR (95%CI) P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) P value
Biochemical pregnancy rate
Small CSD 45.69 (106/232) reference reference
Middle CSD 45.54 (92/202) 0.994 (0.681-1.452) 0.976 0.884 (0.586-1.334) 0.557
Large CSD 32.00 (24/75) 0.559 (0.323-0.969) 0.038* 0.546 (0.305-0.978) 0.042*
Clinical pregnancy rate
Small CSD 40.09 (93/232) reference reference
Middle CSD 39.11 (79/202) 0.960 (0.653-1.412) 0.836 0.862 (0.567-1.310) 0.488
Large CSD 25.33 (19/75) 0.507 (0.283-0.908) 0.022* 0.503 (0.272-0.930)* 0.028*
miscarriage rate
Small CSD 31.18 (29/93) reference reference
Middle CSD 35.44 (28/79) 1.126 (0.645-1.967) 0.675 1.105 (0.620-1.967) 0.735
Large CSD 47.37 (9/19) 0.955 (0.430-2.120) 0.909 1.012 (0.450-2.278) 0.976
Live birth rate
Small CSD 26.29 (61/232) reference reference
Middle CSD 24.75 (50/202) 0.922 (0.598-1.422) 0.714 0.832 (0.522-1.326) 0.439
Large CSD 13.33 (10/75) 0.431 (0.208-0.892) 0.023* 0.422 (0.197-0.902) 0.026*

CSD, cesarean section defect; Values are described as percentage ( number/total number ); Adjusted for age, BMI, fresh or frozen-thawed cycle, stage of embryo transferred, endometrial thickness;*P<0.05.