Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;13:860008. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.860008

Table 3C.

Proportion of physical activity level distribution per disability (EDSS) group (distribution of π).

EDSS group [N] Disability level Low π1 (SD) Moderate π2 (SD) High π3 (SD)
0.0–3.5 [36] No “walking” disability 0.47 (0.07) 0.37 (0.04) 0.15 (0.06)
4.0–5.5 [26] Walking disability present 0.51 (0.05) 0.36 (0.03) 0.13 (0.05)
6.0 [18] Needs a cane to ambulate 0.55 (0.05) 0.34 (0.04) 0.11 (0.04)
6.5 [14] Needs 2 canes or a walker to ambulate 0.61 (0.06) 0.31 (0.07) 0.09 (0.03)

Each participant was fit individually, and the proportion of physical activity was extracted for the group distribution. The greater the level of disability (i.e. EDSS = 6.5) the higher proportion of lower levels of physical activity (π1) recorded, and the lower disability (i.e. EDSS = 0.0–3.5) the greater proportion of moderate (π2) and high physical activity (π3) levels recorded (Kruskal-Wallis Test: p = 0.0001).

EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Score; N, sample size in each group; SD, standard deviation; μ1, mean steps - low physical activity; μ2, mean steps - moderate physical activity; μ3, mean steps - “high” (relatively) physical activity, Low variance, σ1; moderate variance, σ2 and high variance, σ3, π1, Low proportion of physical activity; π2, moderate proportion of physical activity; π3, high proportion of physical activity.