Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2022 Jun 4;3(2):101435. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101435

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2022 The Author(s)

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

TMS artifact correction procedure, related to STAR Methods

(A) EEG data processing workflow and pipeline for Experiments 2 and 3.

(B) Examples of artifact components removed in the first (TMS artifacts, upper row) and second (lower row) ICA analyses.

(C) Effects of artifact rejection procedure on an active TMS condition. One second epoch of one participant before (Raw data) and after (Corrected data) the correction procedure. Dashed lines reflect Pre-stimulus TMS pulses (P).

(D) Effects of artifact rejection procedure on a TMS-artifact free signal. The procedure was applied to ensure that any effect we have observed could not be alternatively explained by a spurious effect of the cleaning protocol adopted. One second epoch of one participant before (Raw data) and after (Corrected data) correction procedure. It can be noticed that the artifact-removal procedure per se does not alter the underlying signal, confirming that the artifact-rejection procedure per se is not accountable for the modulation of the oscillatory activity. Dashed lines reflect simulated pulses (sP). ICA=Independent Components Analyses, A.U.=Arbitrary Units, ms=millisecond. Adapted from Di Gregorio et al. (2022).