Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;20:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.032

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Contact angle of PUA-BLK and PUA-GAT with sessile drop method (A) and captive bubble method (B); (C) the moisture content of PUA-BLK and PUA-GAT (P > 0.05, multiple t tests); (D) in-vitro release profiles of GAT from PUA-GAT IOL with different IBOMA/NVP mass ratio, wherein the mg/g indicated the mass of released GAT in relation to the mass of the dehydrated IOL.