Table 2.
State | Average-risk population |
High-risk population |
Overall∗ |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data sets included | Total number of study participants | NAFLD (%) | Data sets included | Total number of study participants | NAFLD (%) | Data sets included | Total number of study participants | NAFLD (%) | |
Northern and Central India | |||||||||
Delhi | 7 | 3742 | 16.7 | 5 | 601 | 60.4 | 12 | 4343 | 22.8 |
Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 55 | 25.5 | 3 | 258 | 61.2 | 4 | 313 | 55.0 |
Haryana | 5 | 1049 | 22.5 | 1 | 100 | 59 | 6 | 1149 | 25.7 |
Uttarakhand | 1 | 207 | 28.5 | No data | – | – | 1 | 207 | 28.5 |
Jammu and Kashmir | 1 | 50 | 24 | No data | – | – | 1 | 50 | 24 |
Chandigarh | 1 | 986 | 53.5 | No data | – | – | 1 | 986 | 53.5 |
Sub-total | 16 | 6089 | 24.2 | 9 | 959 | 60.5 | 25 | 7048 | 29.1 |
Eastern India | |||||||||
Odisha | 1 | 159 | 24.5 | No data | – | – | 1 | 159 | 24.5 |
West Bengal | 3 | 6762 | 11.9 | 2 | 357 | 59.1 | 5 | 7119 | 14.3 |
Sub-total | 4 | 6921 | 12.2 | 2 | 357 | 59.1 | 6 | 7278 | 14.5 |
Western India | |||||||||
Maharashtra | 2 | 1032 | 21.6 | 2 | 304 | 57.9 | 4 | 1336 | 29.9 |
Rajasthan | 1 | 645 | 15.7 | No data | – | – | 1 | 645 | 15.7 |
Sub-total | 3 | 1677 | 19.3 | 2 | 304 | 57.9 | 5 | 1981 | 25.2 |
Southern India | |||||||||
Tamil Nadu | 5 | 2446 | 30.7 | 5 | 1206 | 36.3 | 10 | 3652 | 32.6 |
Karnataka | 1 | 50 | 20 | 2 | 199 | 49.7 | 3 | 249 | 43.8 |
Kerala | 2 | 2089 | 49.8 | No data | – | – | 2 | 2089 | 49.8 |
Andhra Pradesh | No data | – | – | 1 | 60 | 38.3 | 1 | 60 | 38.3 |
Puducherry | No data | – | – | 1 | 300 | 61 | 1 | 300 | 61 |
Sub-total | 8 | 4585 | 39.3 | 9 | 1765 | 42.1 | 17 | 6350 | 40.1 |
Abbreviation: NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
∗Details provided for 53 out of the 54 data points. One study had participants from multiple states; state-wise distribution of participants was not available.