Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;9:881210. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.881210

Table 3.

Antibacterial activity and percentage of inhibition of P. aeruginosa biofilm after treatment with subinhibitory concentrations of tested Cistus creticus herbal preparations.

Antibacterial activity (mg/mL) CCV ICCV CCI ICCI Ampicillin Streptomycin
Gram positive stains
B. cereus MIC 0.3 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.17 0.03
MBC 0.6 0.37 0.28 0.38 0.20 0.07
M. luteus MIC 0.6 0.37 1.2 0.76 0.13 0.07
MBC 1.2 0.74 2.4 1.5 0.15 0.17
S. aureus MIC 0.3 0.37 1.2 0.38 0.10 0.13
MBC 0.6 0.74 2.4 0.76 0.20 0.30
L. monocytogenes MIC 0.3 0.37 0.6 0.38 0.20 0.22
MBC 0.6 0.74 1.2 0.76 0.33 0.40
Gram negative stains
E. coli MIC 1.2 1.6 2.4 1.5 0.18 0.13
MBC 2.4 3.2 4.8 3 0.27 0.20
P. aeruginosa MIC 0.6 0.37 1.2 0.76 0.40 0.13
MBC 1.2 0.74 2.4 1.5 0.67 0.23
S. typhimurium MIC 0.6 0.37 0.6 0.76 0.13 0.17
MBC 1.2 0.74 1.2 1.5 0.20 0.27
En. cloacae MIC 0.3 0.37 0.6 0.38 0.17 0.03
MBC 0.6 0.74 1.2 0.76 0.20 0.07
P. aeruginosa biofilm inhibition (%)
1/2MIC 79 NE 81.1 79.9 30.9 50.7
1/4MIC 46.7 NE 59.7 20.5 43.5 29
1/8MIC 12 NE NE 14.6 7.8 11.4

Ampicillin and streptomycin were used as positive controls; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimal bactericidal concentration; NE, no effect.

CCI and ICCI- hydroethanolic and infusion extract from Seven Springs, respectively; CCV and ICCV- hydroethanolic and infusion extract from Valley of Butterflyes, respectively.