Table 3.

Study 2A propensity score balance model comparing only nonviolent and both nonviolent and violent protests

Predictors	Policy support
	Estimates	CI	P
(Intercept)	5.42	5.38 to 5.47	<0.001
County total population	−0.01	−0.05 to 0.04	0.728
County median income	−0.00	−0.04 to 0.03	0.884
County percent female	−0.10	−0.13 to −0.06	<0.001
County percent White	0.06	−0.01 to 0.13	0.099
County percent African American	0.03	−0.02 to 0.09	0.245
County percent Asian American	0.02	−0.03 to 0.07	0.420
County percent Hispanic	−0.09	−0.13 to −0.05	<0.001
County per capita police killings	0.03	0.00 to 0.06	0.026
County per capita police killings of African Americans	−0.02	−0.03 to −0.00	0.010
Gender	−0.00	−0.02 to 0.02	0.997
Employment	−0.02	−0.03 to 0.00	0.059
Education	0.17	0.15 to 0.19	<0.001
Protest type: Violent vs. nonviolent only	−0.03	−0.09 to 0.03	0.397
Trump vote share	−0.12	−0.18 to −0.07	<0.001
Political ideology	−1.40	−1.43 to −1.37	<0.001
Protest type × Trump vote share	0.02	−0.04 to 0.08	0.467
Protest type × political ideology	0.00	−0.04 to 0.04	0.940
Trump vote share × political ideology	−0.05	−0.08 to −0.01	0.003
Protest type × Trump vote share × political ideology	0.11	0.07 to 0.15	<0.001
Random effects
σ2	2.40
T 00 countyfips	0.02
ICC	0.01
Ncountyfips	1,325
Observations	38,520
Marginal R2/conditional R2	0.456/0.462

Bold effects indicate statistical significance at P < .05