Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;2022(6):CD011574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011574.pub2

Comparison 23. Sensitivity analysis 3: excluding studies with unclear or high risk of bias on allocation concealment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
23.1 Rate of falls ‐ exercise vs control 8 1299 Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.70, 0.91]
23.2 Number of fallers ‐ exercise vs control 7 838 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.81, 1.03]
23.3 Rate of falls ‐ cholinesterase inhibitor vs placebo 1 129 Rate Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.38, 0.96]
23.3.1 Rivastigmine vs placebo 1 129 Rate Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.38, 0.96]
23.4 Number of fallers ‐ cholinesterase inhibitor vs placebo 1 130 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.87, 1.15]
23.4.1 Rivastigmine vs placebo 1 130 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.87, 1.15]
23.5 Number of fallers ‐ exercise and education vs control 2 320 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.75, 1.08]