Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;2022(6):CD011574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011574.pub2

Comparison 25. Sensitivity analysis 5, excluding studies with unclear or high risk of bias on incomplete outcome data.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
25.1 Rate of falls ‐ exercise vs control 11 1260 Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.65, 0.92]
25.2 Number of fallers ‐ exercise vs control 8 736 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.79, 1.00]
25.3 Rate of falls ‐ cholinesterase inhibitor vs placebo 1 129 Rate Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.38, 0.96]
25.3.1 Rivastigmine vs placebo 1 129 Rate Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.38, 0.96]
25.4 Number of fallers ‐ cholinesterase inhibitor vs placebo 2 168 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.92, 1.16]
25.4.1 Rivastigmine vs placebo 1 130 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.87, 1.15]
25.4.2 Donepezil vs placebo 1 38 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.90, 1.40]
25.5 Rate of falls ‐ exercise and education vs control 1 124 Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.58 [0.74, 3.40]