Comparison 30. Sensitivity analysis 10, reclassifying functional resistance training from resistance training to gait, balance and functional training.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
30.1 Rate of falls ‐ exercise vs control	12	1456	Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.74 [0.63, 0.87]
30.1.1 Gait, balance and functional training vs Control	10	1244	Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.78 [0.68, 0.91]
30.1.2 Resistance training vs control	1	38	Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.84 [0.28, 2.53]
30.1.3 3D exercise (Tai Chi) vs Control	2	174	Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.41 [0.23, 0.72]
30.2 Number of fallers ‐ exercise vs control	9	932	Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.90 [0.80, 1.00]
30.2.1 Gait, balance and functional training vs Control	7	720	Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.93 [0.83, 1.05]
30.2.2 Resistance training vs control	1	38	Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.58 [0.30, 1.13]
30.2.3 3D exercise (Tai Chi) vs control	2	174	Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.59 [0.36, 0.95]