Table 2.
Treatments1 | SEM | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DDGS | Hemp | |||
Performance2 | ||||
Initial BW, kg | 493 | 497 | 17 | 0.80 |
Final BW, kg | 699 | 683 | 7.4 | 0.05 |
DMI, kg | 14.16 | 14.13 | 0.36 | 0.95 |
ADG, kg | 1.83 | 1.69 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
G:F | 0.130 | 0.120 | 0.004 | 0.02 |
NEm, Mcal/kg feed | 1.92 | 1.82 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
NEg, Mcal/kg feed | 1.28 | 1.19 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
Carcass characteristics | ||||
HCW, kg | 422 | 411 | 4.9 | 0.03 |
Dressing, % | 60.44 | 60.51 | 0.5 | 0.90 |
LM area, cm2 | 96.6 | 94.0 | 2.8 | 0.37 |
Fat thickness, cm | 1.74 | 1.66 | 0.16 | 0.61 |
Marbling score3 | 512 | 498 | 21 | 0.48 |
Calculated YG4 | 3.41 | 3.35 | 0.24 | 0.81 |
Treatments consisted of 20% DDGS or 20% Hemp (DM basis) in a finishing ration.
Performance measures were analyzed over the 111-d feeding period.
Marbling score: 400 = Slight00, 450 = Slight50, 500 = Small, etc.
Yield grade (YG) = 2.50 + (0.9843 × rib fat thickness, cm) + (0.2 × 2.5% kidney, pelvic, and heart fat) + (0.0084 × hot carcass weight) − (0.496 × LM area, cm2; USDA, 2017).