Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;23(5):807–821. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01396-9

Table 3.

Utility input data

Description Age General population Mutation carrier p value f Method
Base case Sensitivity analysis e Mean values
DF, age-specific [42] 30–39 0.901 EQ-5D
40–49 0.871
50–59 0.842
60–69 0.823
70–79 0.790
 ≥ 80 0.736
BC a [43] 0.637  ± 20% Meta-regression analysis
MBC b [43] 0.533  ± 20% Meta-regression analysis
OC c [99] 0.410  ± 20% Visual analogue scale
IS d [88] 0.960  ± 5% 1.00  < 0.01 Time trade-off
PBM [88] 0.880  ± 10% 0.88  < 0.11 Time trade-off
PBSO [88] 0.900  ± 10% 0.95  < 0.01 Time trade-off
PBM & PBSO [19] 0.790  ± 10% 0.84 Time trade-off
CP [88] 0.900  ± 5% 0.95  < 0.01 Time trade-off

aUtility value of BC was derived using the constant early BC, mastectomy & reconstruction, chemotherapy non-specific, public community, EQ-5D (model 2)

bUtility value of MBC was derived using the constant MBC, chemotherapy non-specified, response non-specified, public community, EQ-5D (model 2)

cUtility value of OC: the following values were assumed over five years (a recurrence was assumed to occur within about 2 years after primary OC diagnosis [31] and overall survival after recurrence is about 30 months [100]) and averaged [99]: 0.56 (for the 1./2. year (newly diagnosed ovarian cancer—chemotherapy/grades 1–2 toxicity), 0.43 (for the 3./4. year (recurrent ovarian cancer—responding to chemotherapy/grades 1–2 toxicity); 0.08 (5. year (end stage)) resulting in an average calculated utility value of 0.41

dIntensified surveillance: utility value of annual MRI was used (annual mammography: 0.97)

eEstimated variation

f Probability that there is no difference in the utility value between the general population and mutation carriers

Abbreviations: DF (disease-free), BC (breast cancer), MBC (metastatic breast cancer), OC (ovarian cancer), IS (intensified surveillance) PBM (prophylactic bilateral mastectomy), PBSO (prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), CP (chemoprevention)