Table 1.

ANOVA results

	df	F	p	η2
Reaction times
Group	3,84	12.29	< .01	.30
Warning	1,84	35.90	< .01	.30
Warning x Group	3,84	3.05	.03	.10
Executive Control	1,84	130.24	< .01	.61
Executive Control x Group	3,84	5.18	< .01	.16
Cue	2,168	59.79	< .01	.42
Cue x Group	6,168	4.95	< .01	.15
Warning x Executive Control	1,84	0.60	.44	.01
Warning x Executive Control x Group	3,84	.28	.84	.01
Warning x Cue	1,84	.60	.55	.01
Warning x Cue x Group	3,84	.85	.54	.03
Executive Control x Cue	2,168	.83	.44	.01
Executive Control x Cue x Group	6,168	1.47	.19	.05
Warning x Executive Control x Cue	2,168	.37	.69	.004
Warning x Executive Control x Cue x Group	6,168	.75	.61	.03
Alerting	3,84	3.05	.03	.10
Orienting	3,84	4.18	< .01	.13
Executive Control	3,84	5.18	< .01	.16
Costs	3,84	8.04	< .01	.22
Benefits	3,84	2.15	.10	.07
Accuracy
Group	3,84	13.98	< .01	.33
Warning	1,84	7.37	< .01	.08
Warning x Group	3,84	0.15	.93	.005
Executive Control	1,84	23.72	< .01	.22
Executive Control x Group	3,84	0.77	.51	.03
Cue	2,168	1.28	.28	.01
Cue x Group	6,168	2.22	.04	.07
Warning x Executive Control	1,84	0.83	.36	.01
Warning x Executive Control x Group	3,84	0.73	.54	.02
Warning x Cue	2,168	0.03	.97	< .01
Warning x Cue x Group	6,168	0.48	.82	.02
Executive Control x Cue	2,168	0.24	.79	.003
Executive Control x Cue x Group	6,168	0.53	.79	.02
Warning x Executive Control x Cue	2,168	0.23	.80	.003
Warning x Executive Control x Cue x Group	6,168	1.35	.24	.05
Alerting	3,84	.15	.93	.005
Orienting	3,84	3.69	.01	.12
Executive Control	3,84	.77	.51	.03
Costs	3,84	1.04	.38	.04
Benefits	3,84	1.76	.16	.06