Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;13:3254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30916-1

Table 2.

Significantly enriched individual somatic mutations, as well as genes significantly affected by non-synonymous somatic mutations, observed in more than two MUTYH positive tumors.

Gene Variant (context) MUTYH positives MUTYH negatives p-value SBS18/36 relative likelihood (MUTYH positives vs MUTYH negatives)
KRAS c.34G>T p.G12C (CCA>A) 16/19 (84%) 127/5364 (2.4%) 2 × 10−23 62%
PIK3CA c.1636C>A p.Q546K (GCA>A) 7/19 (37%) 36/5364 (0.7%) 6 × 10−11 83%
KRAS Gene-wide 17/19 (89%) 2025/5364 (38%) 5 × 10−6 58% vs 17%
AMER1 Gene-wide 9/19 (47%) 592/5364 (11%) 8 × 10−5 35% vs 12%
PIK3CA Gene-wide 10/19 (53%) 934/5364 (17%) 5 × 10−4 60% vs 12%
ROBO2 Gene-wide 3/19 (16%) 55/5364 (1.0%) 1 × 10−3 42% vs 20%
TAF1L Gene-wide 5/19 (26%) 420/5364 (8%) 0.01 36% vs 13%
SMAD4 Gene-wide 6/19 (32%) 638/5364 (12%) 0.02 36% vs 13%
SMAD2 Gene-wide 4/19 (21%) 308/5364 (6%) 0.02 53% vs 13%
APC Gene-wide 17/19 (89%) 3468/5364 (65%) 0.03 45% vs 18%
ERBB3 Gene-wide 4/19 (21%) 388/5352 (7%) 0.045 47% vs 13%

Somatic mutations observed in the significantly enriched genes in MUTYH positives were more often associated with the trinucleotide contexts related to the SBS18/36 tumor mutational signatures (TMS) as measured by the SBS18/36 relative likelihood. P-values were calculated with Fisher’s exact test (two-sided).