TABLE 2.
Efficiencies of energy generation in D. frappieri TCE1 when different electron donors and acceptors were useda
| Electron donor | Electron acceptor | Product | Growth yield (g of protein/mol of e−) | ΔG°′ (kJ/mol of e−)b | Efficiency (mg of protein/kJ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactate | PCE | cis-DCE | 1.83 | −87.0 | 21 |
| TCE | cis-DCE | 2.15 | −85.7 | 25 | |
| Sulfite | Sulfide | 1.54 | −29.9 | 51 | |
| Nitrate | Nitrite | 1.67 | −82.7 | 20 | |
| Fumarate | Succinate | 3.14 | −44.2 | 71 | |
| Butyrate | PCE | cis-DCE | 2.95 | −73.7 | 40 |
| Formate | PCE | cis-DCE | 1.62 | −86.4 | 19 |
| H2 | PCE | cis-DCE | 1.93 | −85.8 | 23 |
| Ethanol | PCE | cis-DCE | 1.54 | −83.4 | 19 |
The data are data from unique batch experiments.
The ΔG°′ values were used only to compare the efficiencies of strain TCE1 when different electron donor-electron acceptor combinations were used. Because the conditions in the batches were the same for all of the combinations, these values can be used. These values should not be used to predict growth in natural habitats.