Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2021 Dec 7;79(2):799–810. doi: 10.1111/biom.13600

Table 3:

Simulation results for estimation of ΔS(w) and RS(w) in Settings 5 and 6 where W is discrete when n1 = 2000 and n0 = 1500; ESE = empirical standard error, ASE = average standard error; Coverage = coverage of the 95% confidence intervals

Setting 5
ΔS(w) RS(w)
w 0 1 2 0 1 2
Truth 4.400 7.400 10.400 0.780 0.745 0.726
Estimate 4.460 7.482 10.531 0.777 0.742 0.723
Bias −0.060 −0.082 −0.131 0.003 0.003 0.004
ESE 0.249 0.294 0.347 0.014 0.012 0.011
ASE 0.254 0.289 0.352 0.014 0.011 0.010
Coverage 0.944 0.940 0.930 0.964 0.940 0.920
Setting 6 (no heterogeneity)
ΔS(w) RS(w)
w 0 1 2 0 1 2
Truth 6.000 6.000 6.000 0.500 0.500 0.500
Estimate 6.033 6.021 6.029 0.496 0.497 0.496
Bias −0.033 −0.021 −0.029 0.004 0.003 0.004
ESE 0.211 0.216 0.207 0.025 0.025 0.027
ASE 0.211 0.212 0.211 0.026 0.026 0.026
Coverage 0.950 0.944 0.954 0.964 0.964 0.942