Table 4.
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | Accuracy (%) | Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95%CI) | p a | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI-RADS | 95.5 (64/67) | 46.9 | 45.7 | 95.7 | 62.4 | 71.2 (0.643–0.781) | – |
BI-RADS + AP | 86.6 (58/67) | 79 | 65.9 | 92.6 | 81.4 | 82.8 (0.767–0.889) | <0.001 |
BI-RADS + SWE | 91.0 (61/67) | 74.1 | 62.2 | 94.6 | 79.5 | 82.6 (0.767–0.885) | <0.001 |
BI-RADS + AP + SWE | 91.0 (61/67) | 81.1 | 69.3 | 95.1 | 84.3 | 86.1 (0.806–0.916) | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as percentage (numbers).
Comparison of the diagnostic performance between BI-RADS alone with the combination of the qualitative SWE and/or AP with BI-RADS.