Table 2.
Cultivars | DPPH | ABTS | FRAP | CUPRAC | APC (%) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satsuma orange | 55.12 ± 0.08a | 17.15 ± 0.22h | 76.25 ± 0.75c | 25.87 ± 0.27d | 87.68 | 3 |
Chachiensis | 43.19 ± 0.11c | 20.12 ± 0.12e | 88.84 ± 1.13a | 25.87 ± 0.17d | 89.13 | 2 |
Ponkan | 27.44 ± 0.24i | 21.37 ± 0.15b | 79.30 ± 1.11b | 25.03 ± 0.06e | 79.99 | 6 |
Lane late navel orange | 32.67 ± 0.16g | 21.04 ± 0.16bc | 53.59 ± 0.43g | 18.87 ± 0.12h | 69.51 | 9 |
Blood orange | 36.03 ± 0.13e | 20.36 ± 0.06de | 66.99 ± 1.20e | 21.02 ± 0.10g | 75.87 | 7 |
Apple pomelo | 17.95 ± 0.24l | 21.42 ± 0.08b | 25.18 ± 0.60jk | 8.39 ± 0.05k | 46.33 | 12 |
Majia pomelo | 20.18 ± 0.38k | 22.35 ± 0.11a | 28.51 ± 0.60i | 10.76 ± 0.11i | 51.34 | 11 |
Grapefruit | 53.73 ± 0.10b | 21.25 ± 0.06b | 74.68 ± 0.86c | 27.04 ± 0.35c | 92.19 | 1 |
Dekopon | 34.71 ± 0.11f | 20.07 ± 0.08e | 63.75 ± 1.32f | 34.71 ± 0.11a | 73.59 | 8 |
Fertile orange | 37.48 ± 0.18d | 20.84 ± 0.07c | 71.15 ± 1.61d | 23.39 ± 0.05f | 80.26 | 5 |
Lemon | 43.16 ± 0.18c | 18.95 ± 0.24f | 74.95 ± 0.26c | 29.35 ± 0.13b | 86.86 | 4 |
Sichuan kumquat | 23.96 ± 0.56j | 17.72 ± 0.11g | 27.82 ± 0.37ij | 9.51 ± 0.03j | 46.62 | 13 |
Longyan kumquat | 28.94 ± 0.13h | 20.73 ± 0.12cd | 35.80 ± 0.80h | 11.01 ± 0.08i | 55.77 | 10 |
Bergamot | 17.51 ± 0.34l | 15.85 ± 0.09i | 23.78 ± 0.56k | 8.60 ± 0.06k | 39.69 | 14 |
DPPH, free radical scavenging properties by diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant capacity; CUPRAC, cupric reducing antioxidant capacity.
Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The APC index is the average of the antioxidant potency composite index in all tested CPFEs, and APC index = (measured score / maximum score) ×100%. Different letters above the error bars in the same column indicate significant differences among varieties based on Tukey's test (P <0.05).