Table 11.
Numerical comparison of HIOA for t-entropy as objective function over satellite image
Number of thresholds (nt) | HIOAs | Time (sec.) | FSIM | PSNR | SSIM | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | PO | 0.893337 | 3.89E-20 | 5.4789 | 0.9619 | 18. 94 | 0.7868 |
CHIO | 0.893336 | 1.02E-21 | 5.4997 | 0.9618 | 18.92 | 0.7866 | |
HBO | 0.893336 | 1.39E-21 | 5.5004 | 0.9618 | 18.90 | 0.7865 | |
FBIO | 0.893336 | 8.36E-20 | 5.5858 | 0.9615 | 18.75 | 0.7864 | |
BRO | 0.893336 | 1.24E-20 | 5.6151 | 0.9611 | 18.74 | 0.7862 | |
HUA | 0.893335 | 1.59E-21 | 6.0044 | 0.9599 | 18.67 | 0.7859 | |
PSO | 0.893335 | 1. 58E-20 | 6.1117 | 0.9589 | 18.59 | 0.7853 | |
8 | PO | 1.166417 | 5.66E-21 | 6.6935 | 0.9891 | 22. 99 | 0.8961 |
CHIO | 1.166384 | 5.28E-20 | 6.7125 | 0.9888 | 22. 69 | 0.8958 | |
HBO | 1.166377 | 4.42E-20 | 6.7211 | 0.9885 | 22.61 | 0.8955 | |
FBIO | 1.166368 | 1.76E-20 | 6.7455 | 0.9881 | 22.59 | 0.8954 | |
BRO | 1.166361 | 7.98E-20 | 6.7401 | 0.9879 | 22.55 | 0.8951 | |
HUA | 1.166343 | 7.81E-20 | 7.1012 | 0.9875 | 22.49 | 0.8948 | |
PSO | 1.166315 | 1.13E-20 | 7.1113 | 0.98471 | 22.41 | 0.8945 |
Best results are highlighted in bold