Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;20:261. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03458-9

Table 3.

Performance metrics for integrated I-score (two-category) models and reference models

Models Discovery cohort Validation cohort
iAUCa Harrell’s C-index AIC iAUC Harrell’s C-index AIC
TNM stage model b 0.674 0.694 (0.640–0.749) 615.6 0.645 0.651 (0.596–0.705) 742.3
I-score model 0.584 0.592 (0.532–0.651) 647.4 0.592 0.588 (0.533–0.644) 758.6
TNM Stage & I-score model b 0.699 0.711 (0.651–0.772) 613.5 0.673 0.679 (0.623–0.736) 736.4
Clinicopathologic model c 0.698 0.728 (0.676–0.781) 614.2 0.671 0.685 (0.627–0.743) 739.2
Full model c 0.717 0.742 (0.688–0.795) 610.9 0.684 0.695 (0.639–0.751) 734.8

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals

iAUC integrated area under the curve, Harrell’s C-index Harrell’s concordance index, AIC Akaike information criterion

aiAUC refers to the integrated area under the ROC curve

b TNM-stage model vs. TNM Stage & I-score model: likelihood ratio P = 0.044

cClinicopathologic model (TMN stage & differentiation grade & adjuvant chemotherapy) vs. Full model: likelihood ratio P = 0.022