Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;12:876668. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876668

Table 4.

Comparison of clinicopathological factors between high splenic volume and low splenic volume group.

High splenic volume (N=88) Low splenic volume (N=45) P value
HBsAg (+), n (%) 71 (80.7)
69 (78.4)
35 (77.8)
25 (55.6)
0.694
0.006
Cirrhosis, n (%)
Platelet,103L
(mean ± SD)
145.06 ± 56.05 189.49 ± 55.92 <0.001
Tumor size, cm
(mean ± SD)
5.40 ± 3.78 4.43 ± 2.30 0.071
AFP, ng/ml, n (%)
 ≤400
 >400
68 (77.3)
20 (22.7)
32 (71.1)
13 (28.9)
0.436
Tumor number, n (%)
 1
 >2
71 (80.7)
17 (19.3)
38 (84.4)
7 (15.6)
0.593
MVI, n (%)
 No
 Yes
60 (68.2)
28 (31.8)
32 (71.1)
13 (28.9)
0.729
Satellitosis, n (%) 10 (11.4) 0 0.045
BCLC staging, n (%)
 A
 B
 C
71 (80.7)
11 (12.5)
6 (6.8)
40 (88.9)
5 (11.1)
0
0.073
Differentiation, n (%)
 Well
 Moderate
 Poor
6 (6.8)
73 (83.0)
9 (10.2)
4 (8.9)
30 (66.7)
11 (24.4)
0.084
Recurrence, n (%) 33 (37.5) 6 (13.3) 0.004

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).

AFP, α-fetoprotein level; HBsAg, hepatitis be antigen; MVI, microvascular invasion; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.