Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e12170. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12170

TABLE 1.

Distribution of the main methodologies used in data‐driven eczema and atopic dermatitis (AD) publications

Discipline Methodology Number of publications
Total (of 620) Only eczema (of 255) Only AD (of 265) Both (of 100)
Multivariate statistics (MS) Cluster analysis 206 84 90 32
Factor analysis 89 26 46 17
Logistic regression 56 24 17 15
Latent class/Transition models 55 31 12 12
Principal component analysis 46 17 20 9
Discriminant analysis 28 8 16 4
Markov model 28 8 12 8
Structural equation modelling 11 5 4 2
Mixture model 7 3 4 0
Correspondence analysis 3 2 1 0
Latent variable model 3 2 1 0
Canonical correlation 1 0 1 0
Machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML&AI) Artificial neural networks (including CNNs) 67 44 21 2
Machine learning 48 25 17 6
Support vector machine 36 24 11 1
Artificial intelligence 17 8 7 2
Decision trees 17 7 6 4
Deep learning 13 9 3 1
Natural language processing 12 7 5 0
Random forests 9 6 2 1
Supervised learning 2 2 0 0
Unsupervised learning 1 1 0 0
Bayesian statistics (BS) Bayesian framework 14 8 5 1
Bayesian network 5 4 1 0
Random‐effects Bayesian network meta‐analysis 4 0 1 3
Bayesian machine learning model 3 2 0 1
Bayesian spatial and temporal models 3 1 2 0
Naïve Bayesian classifier 2 2 0 0
Bayesian meta‐regression 2 0 1 1
Bayesian model averaging 2 2 0 0
Bayesian latent class analysis 1 1 0 0
Random‐effects Bayesian hierarchical model 1 0 1 0

Note: Search strings representing the methodologies were searched for in the title, abstract, and keywords of the multivariate statistics (MS) and machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML&AI) publications. Methods for Bayesian statistics (BS) were determined manually. Number of publications are given for the total collection and additionally separated according to the term used, only eczema, only AD, or both. For each method, the highest number of publications between only eczema and only AD is bolded.