Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chronobiol Int. 2021 Apr 27;38(8):1151–1161. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1912073

Table 5.

Adjusted* Odds Ratios for chronotype and endometrial cancer risk among post-menopausal women in the California Teachers Study, stratified by chronotype stability.

Stable chronotype** Not stable chronotype**
Chronotype at Questionnaire 5
(post-menopause)
Number of Cases Number
of Controls
OR (05% CI) Number
of Cases
Number
of Controls
OR (05% CI)
Morning type (referent) 107 7,320 1.00 38 2,810 1.00
More morning than evening 43 2,632 1.10 (0.77, 1.58) 36 2,570 1.08 (0.68, 1.72)
Neither 27 1,420 1.18 (0.77, 1.81) 27 2,048 0.88 (0.53, 1.45)
More evening than morning 36 2,488 1.05 (0.71, 1.54) 30 1,315 1.31 (0.80, 2.16)
Evening type 61 2,490 1.50 (1.09, 2.07) 18 678 1.37 (0.77, 2.46)
*

Multivariable models included age at baseline, race/ethnicity, BMI at baseline, height, family history of endometrial cancer, family history of breast cancer, history of oral contraceptive (OC) use, history of live births combined with breast feeding, and NSAID use.

**

Stable chronotype was defined as having the same chronotype reported on questionnaire 5 (post-menopause) as in teens and college years.