. 2022 May 24;9:888191. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.888191

Table 9.

Effects of different doses of C. butyricum on genus relative fecal microbiota abundance (>1.0%) of fattening goats.

	Diet^c
Item	CON	LCB	HCB	SEM^d	*P-value*
RuminococcaceaeUCG005	17.34	10.84	13.45	1.23	0.081
RikenellaceaeRC9gutgroup	6.98	6.45	7.40	0.87	0.922
ChristensenellaceaeR7group	4.21	3.82	5.61	0.48	0.306
Eubacteriumcoprostanoligenesgroup	5.32	4.18	4.29	0.57	0.704
Lachnospiraceaeunclassified	4.26	3.02	5.15	0.43	0.122
RuminococcaceaeUCG010	4.17	2.47	4.15	0.65	0.521
Alistipes	2.32	4.69	3.02	0.44	0.062
Firmicutesunclassified	3.21	2.99	3.21	0.32	0.958
Treponema2	1.36	6.98	2.94	1.49	0.312
Bacteroides	3.09	3.91	3.12	0.41	0.701
Ruminococcus1	3.04	2.53	3.22	0.64	0.918
RuminococcaceaeUCG014	3.22	2.09	1.75	0.34	0.186
Muribaculaceaeunclassified	2.35	1.96	4.07	1.25	0.799
Clostridium	3.79^a	1.37^b	1.29^b	0.48	<0.036
RuminococcaceaeUCG013	1.92	2.07	1.56	0.36	0.861
Akkermansia	0.15	3.28	1.29	0.58	0.069
RuminococcaceaeNK4A214group	1.78	1.21	1.60	0.12	0.782
RuminococcaceaeUCG002	1.12	1.77	0.16	0.19	0.493
Olsenella	0.74	2.41	1.83	0.53	0.509
Bacteroidalesunclassified	1.42	0.92	1.09	0.40	0.236
Ruminococcaceaeunclassified	0.23	1.19	2.87	0.16	0.486
Fibrobacter	0.16	3.99	0.21	0.73	0.366
Campylobacter	1.31	0.55	0.65	0.96	0.177
Ruminococcus2	0.37	0.60	1.98	0.17	0.150
F082unclassified	0.86^b	0.77^b	1.24^a	0.29	<0.034
ClostridialesvadinBB60groupunclassified	1.46	0.47	0.58	0.14	0.350
MollicutesRF39unclassified	0.72	0.66	1.12	0.21	0.104

^ab

with row, different superscripts indicate differences between treatments (P ≤ 0.05).

Diets: CON, control, a basal diet; LCB, low C. butyricum, a basal diet plus 2.0 × 10⁸ CFU/kg; HCB, high C. butyricum, a basal diet plus 1.0 × 10⁹ CFU/kg.

SEM, total standard error of means (n = 4).