Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2021 Jul 29;9(2):222–235. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000477

Table 3.

Moderation Results of the Association Between Sexism and Psychological Distress

Psychological distress
Variable B SE t 95% CI R 2 F ΔR2 ΔF
Model 1 .21 2.80* .06 4.18*
 Control variables
  Age −0.05* 0.03 −2.09 [−0.11, −0.01]
  Race/ethnicity −0.15 0.17 −0.86 [−0.48, 0.19]
 Main effects
  Sexism −0.01 0.01 −0.12 [−0.02, 0.01]
  Gender identity −0.13 0.17 −0.76 [−0.46, 0.21]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Gender identity 0.02* 0.01 2.04 [0.01, 0.04]
Model 2 .21 2.78* .07 4.62*
 Control variables
  Age −0.04 0.03 −1.61 [−0.09, 0.01]
  Race/ethnicity −0.22 0.17 −1.30 [−0.56, 0.12]
 Main effects
  Sexism 0.01 0.01 1.47 [−0.01, 0.02]
  Masculine gender presentation −0.01 0.06 −0.22 [−0.14, 0.11]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Masculine gender presentation 0.01* 0.01 2.15 [0.01, 0.02]

Note. Unstandardized β coefficients are reported. Model 1 includes gender identity as a moderator variable. Model 2 includes masculine gender presentation as a moderator variable. Race/ethnicity: 0 = White; 1 = racial/ethnic minority. Gender identity: 0 = cisgender; 1 = gender minority.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.