Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2021 Jul 29;9(2):222–235. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000477

Table 4.

Moderation Results of the Association Between Sexism and Alcohol-Related Consequences

Alcohol-related consequences
Variable B SE t 95% CI R 2 F ΔR2 ΔF
Model 3 .10 1.21 .01 0.01
 Control variables
  Age 0.10 0.12 0.86 [−0.14, 0.35]
  Race/ethnicity −0.34 0.79 −0.43 [−1.94, 1.25]
 Main effects
  Sexism 0.05 0.03 1.49 [−0.02, 0.12]
  Gender identity 0.08 0.78 0.11 [−1.48, 1.65]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Gender identity −0.01 0.04 −0.10 [−0.09, 0.08]
Model 4 .12 1.41 0.01 0.71
 Control variables
  Age 0.12 0.12 1.02 [−0.12, 0.37]
  Race/ethnicity −0.43 0.79 −0.54 [−2.02, 1.16]
 Main effects
  Sexism 0.04 0.02 1.86 [−0.01, 0.09]
  Masculine gender presentation 0.14 0.28 0.50 [−0.43, 0.71]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Masculine gender presentation 0.01 0.02 0.84 [−0.02, 0.05]

Note. Unstandardized β coefficients are reported. Model 3 includes gender identity as a moderator variable. Model 4 includes masculine gender presentation as a moderator variable. Race/ethnicity: 0 = White; 1 = racial/ethnic minority. Gender identity: 0 = cisgender; 1 = gender minority.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.