Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2021 Jul 29;9(2):222–235. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000477

Table 5.

Moderation Results of the Association Between Sexism and Drug-Related Consequences

Drug-related consequences
Variable B SE t 95% CI R 2 F ΔR2 ΔF
Model 5 .11 1.29 .01 0.19
 Control variables
  Age 0.02 0.08 0.19 [−0.15, 0.18]
  Race/ethnicity 0.15 0.54 0.27 [−0.95, 1.24]
 Main effects
  Sexism 0.04 0.02 1.82 [−0.01, 0.09]
  Gender identity −0.47 0.54 −0.88 [−1.55, 0.61]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Gender identity −0.01 0.03 −0.43 [−0.07, 0.05]
Model 6 .21 2.76* .06 4.19*
 Control variables
  Age 0.06 0.08 0.76 [−0.09, 0.22]
  Race/ethnicity −0.01 0.52 −0.01 [−1.04, 1.03]
 Main effects
  Sexism 0.02 0.01 1.52 [−0.01, 0.05]
  Masculine gender presentation 0.36 0.19 1.92 [−0.02, 0.73]
 Interaction effect
  Sexism × Masculine gender presentation 0.02* 0.01 2.05 [0.01, 0.04]

Note. Unstandardized β coefficients are reported. Model 5 includes gender identity as a moderator variable. Model 6 includes masculine gender presentation as a moderator variable. Race/ethnicity: 0 = White; 1 = racial/ethnic minority. Gender identity: 0 = cisgender; 1 = gender minority.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.